SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC.

5125 Lankershim Boulevard

North Hollywood, CA 91601

NOTICE OF 2005 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held on May 24, 2005

To Our Stockholders:

      You are cordially invited to attend the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “2005 Annual Meeting”) of Save the World Air, Inc., which will be held at the Sheraton Universal Hotel, 333 Universal Hollywood Drive, Universal City, California 91608, at 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, May 24, 2005 for the purposes of considering and voting upon:

      These matters are described more fully in the proxy statement accompanying this notice.

      Our stockholders will also act upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. The Board is not aware of any other business to be presented to a vote of the stockholders at the 2005 Annual Meeting.

      The Board has fixed the close of business on April 8, 2005 as the record date (the “Record Date”) for determining those stockholders who will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the 2005 Annual Meeting. The stock transfer books will remain open between the Record Date and the date of the 2005 Annual Meeting.

      Representation of at least a majority in voting interest of our common stock either in person or by proxy is required to constitute a quorum for purposes of voting on each proposal to be voted on at the 2005 Annual Meeting. Accordingly, it is important that your shares be represented at the 2005 Annual Meeting. WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE 2005 ANNUAL MEETING, PLEASE COMPLETE, DATE AND SIGN THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD AND RETURN IT IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. Your proxy may be revoked at any time prior to the time it is voted at the 2005 Annual Meeting.

      Please read the accompanying proxy material carefully. Your vote is important and we appreciate your cooperation in considering and acting on the matters presented.

April 29, 2005

North Hollywood, California

Stockholders Should Read the Entire Proxy Statement

Carefully Prior to Returning Their Proxies

PROXY STATEMENT FOR 2005

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

OF

SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC.

To Be Held on May 24, 2005

       This proxy statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation by our Board of Directors (the “Board”) of proxies to be voted at the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “2005 Annual Meeting”) of Save the World Air, Inc. (the “Company”), which will be held at 10:00 a.m. on May 24, 2005 at the Sheraton Universal Hotel, 333 Universal Hollywood Drive, Universal City, California 91608, or at any adjournments or postponements thereof, for the purposes set forth in the accompanying Notice of 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Notice”). This proxy statement and the proxy card are first being delivered or mailed to stockholders on or about May 6, 2005. Our 2004 Annual Report to Stockholders and our Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2004 on Form 10-KSB (the “10-KSB”) are being mailed to stockholders concurrently with this proxy statement. Neither our 2004 Annual Report to Stockholders nor the 10-KSB are to be regarded as proxy soliciting material or as a communication by means of which any solicitation of proxies is to be made.

VOTING RIGHTS AND SOLICITATION

      The close of business on April 8, 2005 was the record date (the “Record Date”) for stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the 2005 Annual Meeting. As of the Record Date, we had 38,450,321 shares of common stock, par value $.001 per share issued and outstanding. All of the shares of our common stock outstanding on the Record Date, and only those shares, are entitled to vote on each of the proposals to be voted upon at the 2005 Annual Meeting. Holders of the common stock of record entitled to vote at the 2005 Annual Meeting will have one vote for each share of common stock so held with regard to each matter to be voted upon.

      All votes will be tabulated by the inspector of elections appointed for the 2005 Annual Meeting, who will separately tabulate affirmative and negative votes, abstentions and broker non-votes.

      The holders of a majority in voting interest of the common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the 2005 Annual Meeting shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the 2005 Annual Meeting. The voting interest of shares of the common stock represented in person or by proxy will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the 2005 Annual Meeting. Shares which abstain from voting as to a particular matter will be treated as shares that are present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining the voting interest present and entitled to vote with respect to any particular matter, but will not be counted as votes cast on such matter. If a broker or nominee holding stock in “street name” indicates on a proxy that it does not have discretionary authority to vote as to a particular matter, those shares will not be considered as present and entitled to vote with respect to such matter and will not be counted as a vote cast on such matter.

      In voting with regard to the proposal to elect directors (Proposal 1), stockholders may vote in favor of all the nominees, withhold their votes as to all nominees or withhold their votes as to a specific nominee. The vote required by Proposal 1 is governed by Nevada law and is a plurality of the votes cast by the holders of shares entitled to vote, provided a quorum is present. As a result, in accordance with Nevada law, votes that are withheld and broker non-votes will not be counted and will have no effect on the voting for election of directors.

      In voting with regard to the proposal to increase the number of shares of common stock that may be issued under the 2004 Stock Option Plan (the “2004 Plan”) (Proposal 2), stockholders may vote in favor of such proposal or against such proposal or may abstain from voting. The vote required to approve Proposal 2 is governed by Nevada law, and the minimum vote required is a majority of the total votes cast on such proposal, provided a quorum is present. As a result, in accordance with Nevada law, abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted and will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on this proposal.

      In voting with regard to the proposal to ratify the appointment of our independent auditor (Proposal 3), stockholders may vote in favor of such proposal or against such proposal or may abstain from voting. The vote required to approve Proposal 3 is governed by Nevada law, and the minimum vote required is a majority of the total votes cast on such proposal, provided a quorum is present. As a result, in accordance with Nevada law, abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted and will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on this proposal.

      Under the rules of The New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) that govern most domestic stock brokerage firms, member brokerage firms that hold shares in “street name” for beneficial owners may, to the extent that such beneficial owners do not furnish voting instructions with respect to any or all proposals submitted for stockholder action, vote in their discretion upon proposals which are considered “discretionary” proposals under the rules of the NYSE. Member brokerage firms that have received no instructions from their clients as to “non-discretionary” proposals do not have discretion to vote on these proposals. Such broker non-votes will not be considered in determining whether a quorum exists at the 2005 Annual Meeting and will not be considered as votes cast in determining the outcome of any proposal.

      Shares of our common stock represented by proxies in the accompanying form which are properly executed and returned to us will be voted at the 2005 Annual Meeting in accordance with the stockholders’ instructions contained therein. In the absence of contrary instructions, shares represented by such proxies will be voted FOR each of Proposal 1, Proposal 2 and Proposal 3. Management does not know of any matters to be presented at the 2005 Annual Meeting other than those set forth in this proxy statement and in the Notice accompanying this proxy statement. If other matters should properly come before the 2005 Annual Meeting, the proxyholders will vote on such matters in accordance with their best judgment.

      Any stockholder has the right to revoke his, her or its proxy at any time before it is voted at the 2005 Annual Meeting by giving written notice to our Secretary, and by executing and delivering to the Secretary a duly executed proxy card bearing a later date, or by appearing at the 2005 Annual Meeting and voting in person; provided, however, that under the rules of the NYSE, any beneficial owner whose shares are held in “street name” by a member brokerage firm may revoke his, her or its proxy and vote his, her or its shares in person at the 2005 Annual Meeting only in accordance with the applicable rules and procedures of the NYSE.

      The entire cost of soliciting proxies will be borne by the Company. Proxies will be solicited principally through the use of the mails, but, if deemed desirable, may be solicited personally or by telephone, or special letter by our officers and regular employees for no additional compensation. Arrangements may be made with brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to send proxies and proxy material to the beneficial owners of our common stock, and such persons may be reimbursed for their expenses.

PROPOSAL 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Composition of Board of Directors

      Our bylaws provide that the Board shall consist of not less than seven and not more than eleven directors. The Board currently consists of seven members elected by the holders of the common stock. The Board has fixed the size of the Board to be elected at the 2005 Annual Meeting at seven members. Our directors are elected by our stockholders at each annual meeting of stockholders and will serve until their successors are elected and qualified, or until their earlier resignation or removal. There are no family relationships among any of our current directors, the nominees for directors or our executive officers.

      The proxyholders named on the proxy card intend to vote all proxies received by them in the accompanying form FOR the election of the nominees listed below, unless instructions to the contrary are marked on the proxy. These nominees have been selected by the Board, acting upon the recommendation of the Board’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. All of the nominees are currently members of the Board. If elected, each nominee will serve until the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2006 or until his or her successor has been duly elected and qualified.

      In the event that a nominee is unable or declines to serve as a director at the time of the 2005 Annual Meeting, the proxies will be voted for any nominee who shall be designated by the present Board to fill the vacancy. In the event that additional persons are nominated for election as directors, the proxyholders intend to vote all proxies received by them for the nominees listed below, unless instructions are given to the contrary. As of the date of this proxy statement, the Board is not aware of any nominee who is unable or will decline to serve as a director.

Nominees for Election as Directors

      The following is certain information as of April 8, 2005 regarding the nominees for election as directors:

Biographical Information Regarding Directors

      Edward L. Masry, Esq. has served as our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer since October 2001 and served as our President from October 2001 until March 2004. Mr. Masry has been a member of the law firm of Masry & Vititoe PC since 1986 and was Mayor of Thousand Oaks City and currently a member of the City Council. From 1960 to 1986, he was a partner of various law firms. Mr. Masry was corporate director of Merlin Olsen Porsche Audi from 1970 to 1988 and corporate director of Gabriel Olsen Volkswagen from 1969 to 1973. Mr. Masry received a J.D. from Loyola Law School, Los Angeles.

      Eugene E. Eichler, CPA, has served as our President since March 2004, our Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since October 2001 and as a director since May 2002. Mr. Eichler was the Chief Financial Officer and Firm Administrator of the law firm Masry & Vititoe PC from 1982 to October 2001. From 1974 to 1982, Mr. Eichler provided financial consulting services to Foundation for HMO’s, Acne Care Medical Clinics and Earth Foods, Inc. From 1960 to 1974, Mr. Eichler headed financial consulting services for Milburn Industries and Brown, Eichler & Company. From 1953 to 1960, he held the position of Chief Budgets and Forecasts at North American Aviation. From 1951 to 1953, Mr. Eichler held various audit positions at the Atomic Energy Commission. Mr. Eichler received a B.A. from University of Montana.

      Bruce H. McKinnon has served as a director since May 2002, our Executive Vice-President of Business Development since December 2003 and our Chief Operating Officer since March 2004. Mr. McKinnon served

as Chief Executive Officer and President of KZ Golf, Inc., an international golf equipment company, from 1994 to 2004. From 1990 to 1994, he was President and Chief Executive Officer of TTL Corporation and Novaterra, Inc., environmental remediation and technology corporations. Prior to 1990, Mr. McKinnon was an owner, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of several international trading and manufacturing corporations.

      Robert F. Sylk has served as a director since October 2001. He currently is one of the board of directors of the La Quinta, California Chamber of Commerce and Chairman of its Ambassadors Committee. From 1991 to 2003, he has served as a senior executive of Mirage Resorts. He was a delegate to the California Tourism and Trade Commission from 1994 to 1998. From 1993 to 1997, he was Senior Vice President of the Marina Del Rey Chamber of Commerce. He was a board member for the Los Angeles County Department of Beaches and Harbors and on the Board of the United Service Organizations (U.S.O.) from 1993 to 2000. Mr. Sylk is presently a director for the Agua Caliente Casino, located in Rancho Mirage, Calif.

      Hon. J. Joseph (“John”) Brown, AO has served as a director since May 2002. He has served as Chairman of the Australian Tourism Task Force since 1989 and currently is a professional consultant to Service Corporation International Australia. Mr. Brown has also served as director of Macquarie Tourism and Leisure since 1990. From 1983 to 1988, Mr. Brown was Minister for Sport and Tourism for the Australian government and from 1987 to 1988 he was the Minister for the Environment. He was a member of the Olympics bid teams for Brisbane (1992), Melbourne (1996) and the successful Sydney bid (2000). Mr. Brown was Founding Director of the Sydney Olympic Games Organizing Committee in 1992 and the Sydney Paralympic Organizing Committee in 1998.

      John F. Price, PhD has served as a director since May 2002. He co-founded and has served as Chairman of the Board of Conscious Investing Pty Ltd., a software company, since May 2001. In June 1998, Mr. Price founded Price Value, Inc., a software company to market software that he developed. He has served as Chairman of the Board of Price Value, Inc. since 1998. Since October 1997, Mr. Price has held various teaching positions in mathematics and physics at University of New South Wales. From 1990 to 1998, he was professor and head of the Mathematics Department at Maharishi University of Management. Mr. Price received a B.Sc. and M.Sc. from the University of Melbourne and a Ph.D. from the Australian National University.

      Joseph Helleis has served as a director since May 2002. Since 2002, he has been operating his own financial services consulting firm, Joseph Helleis and Associates. From 2000 to 2002, he was President/ Chief Executive Officer with Bank of Whittier, California. From 1981 to 2000, he served in senior executive capacities as Chairman/ CEO, President/ CEO, and Chief Credit Officer with number of financial institutions in the southern California region. After his honorable discharge from the United States Navy in 1960, Mr. Helleis served with Citibank in New York City until 1981 where his last position was Vice President/ Senior Credit Officer for the New York State Business Banking Region. Mr. Helleis has an AA degree from the National Institute of Credit.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

      We maintain a corporate governance page on our corporate website at www.savetheworldair.com, which includes information regarding the Company’s corporate governance practices. Our codes of business conduct and ethics, Board committee charters and certain other corporate governance documents and policies are available on that website. Any changes to these documents and any waivers granted with respect to our code of business conduct will be posted on our website. In addition, we will provide a copy of any of these documents without charge to any stockholder upon written request made to Corporate Secretary, Save the World Air, Inc., 5125 Lankershim Boulevard, North Hollywood, California 91601. The information on our website is not, and shall not be deemed to be, a part of this proxy statement or incorporated by reference into this or any other filing we make with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

Board of Directors

      Our Board of Directors currently consists of seven members. The Board has affirmatively determined that Messrs. Helleis, Sylk, Price and Brown are independent under the standards currently in effect of the Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”).

      The Board held four meetings during 2004. Each of the directors attended 75% or more of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board and committees on which the director served in 2004. Because the Company is in the development stage and has no operations, our non-management directors do not meet regularly in executive session without management present.

      Each of our directors is encouraged to attend the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders and to be available to answer any questions posed by stockholders to such director. Because our Board holds one of its regular meetings in conjunction with our annual meeting of stockholders, unless one or more members of the Board are unable to attend, all of the members of the Board are present for the annual meeting. All of the incumbent directors attended our 2004 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

      The following procedures have been established by the Board in order to facilitate communications between our stockholders and the Board:

      Our stockholders may also communicate directly with the non-management directors, individually or as a group, by mail c/o Corporate Secretary, Save the World Air, Inc., 5125 Lankershim Boulevard, North Hollywood, California 91601, or by e-mail to questions@savetheworldair.com.

      The Audit Committee is in the process of establishing procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding questionable accounting, internal controls, financial improprieties or auditing matters. Any of the Company’s employees may confidentially communicate concerns about any of these matters by calling our toll-free number, (877) 487-0200. Upon receipt of a complaint or concern, a determination will be made whether it pertains to accounting, internal controls or auditing matters and if it does, it will be handled in accordance with the procedures established by the Audit Committee.

Committees of the Board

      The Board has a standing Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Each of these committees operates under a written charter. Copies of these charters, and other corporate governance documents, are available on our website, www.savetheworldair.com. In addition, we will provide a copy of any of these documents without charge to any stockholder upon written request made to Corporate Secretary, Save the World Air, Inc., 5125 Lankershim Boulevard, North Hollywood, California 91601.

      The composition, functions and general responsibilities of each committee are summarized below.

      The Audit Committee consists of Messrs. Helleis (chairperson), Eichler, McKinnon and Price. The Board has determined that Mr. Helleis is an audit committee financial expert, as that term is defined in Item 401(e) of Regulation S-B of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and is independent within the meaning of Item 7(d)(3)(iv) of Schedule 14A of the Exchange Act and the requirements of Nasdaq as currently in effect. The Board also believes that Mr. Price meets the independence and knowledge requirements of Nasdaq as currently in effect, and that Messrs. Eichler and McKinnon meet the knowledge requirements but not the independence requirements of Nasdaq as currently in effect. The Audit Committee held a total of four meetings during 2004.

      The Audit Committee operates under a written charter. The Audit Committee’s duties include responsibility for reviewing our accounting practices and audit procedures. In addition, the Audit Committee has responsibility for reviewing complaints about, and investigating allegations of, financial impropriety or misconduct. The Audit Committee works closely with management and our independent auditors. The Audit Committee also meets with our independent auditors on a quarterly basis, following completion of their quarterly reviews and annual audit, to review the results of their work. The Audit Committee also meets with our independent auditors to approve the annual scope of the audit services to be performed.

      As part of its responsibility, the Audit Committee is responsible for engaging our independent auditor, as well as pre-approving audit and non-audit services performed by our independent auditor in order to assure that the provision of such services does not impair the independent auditor’s independence. The Audit Committee is in the process of establishing a pre-approval policy.

      Please see “Audit Committee Report” below, which provides further details of many of the duties and responsibilities of the Audit Committee.

      The Compensation Committee currently consists of Messrs. Helleis (chairperson), Brown and Price. Mr. McKinnon also served on the Compensation Committee until May 2004. The Board believes that Messrs. Helleis, Brown and Price meet the independence requirements of Nasdaq as currently in effect. None of our executive officers served on the compensation committee of another entity or on any other committee of the board of directors of another entity performing similar functions during 2004. The Compensation Committee held two meetings during 2004.

      The Compensation Committee operates under a written charter. The Compensation Committee establishes the compensation and benefits of our executive officers. The Compensation Committee also administers our employee benefit plans, including our 2004 Plan.

      Please see “Compensation Committee Report” below, which details the Compensation Committee’s report on our executive compensation for 2004.

      The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee currently consists of Messrs. Helleis (chairperson), Brown and Sylk. Mr. Sylk joined the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in May 2004. The Board believes that Messrs. Helleis, Brown and Sylk meet the independence requirements of Nasdaq as currently in effect. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held one meeting during 2004.

      The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee operates under a written charter. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has the primary responsibility for overseeing the Company’s corporate governance compliance practices, as well as supervising the affairs of the Company as they relate to the nomination of directors. The principal ongoing functions of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee include developing criteria for selecting new directors, establishing and monitoring procedures for the receipt and consideration of director nominations by stockholders and others, considering and examining director candidates, developing and recommending corporate governance principles for the Company and monitoring the Company’s compliance with these principles and establishing and monitoring procedures for the receipt of stockholder communications directed to the Board.

      The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is also responsible for conducting an annual evaluation of the Board to determine whether the Board and its committees are functioning effectively. In performing this evaluation, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receives comments from all directors and reports annually to the Board with the results of this evaluation.

Director Nominations

      The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee seeks out appropriate candidates to serve as directors of the Company, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee interviews and examines director candidates and makes recommendations to the Board regarding candidate selection. In considering candidates to serve as director, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates various minimum individual qualifications, including strength of character, maturity of judgment, relevant technical skills or financial acumen, diversity of viewpoint and industry knowledge, as well as the extent to which the candidate would fill a present need on the Board.

      The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider stockholder nominations for director. Nominations for director submitted to this committee by stockholders are evaluated according to the Company’s overall needs and the nominee’s knowledge, experience and background. A nominating stockholder must give appropriate notice to the Company of the nomination not less than 90 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting. In the event that the date of the annual meeting is advanced by more than 30 days or delayed by more than 60 days from the anniversary date of the preceding year’s annual meeting, the notice by the stockholder must be delivered not later than the close of business on the later of the 60th day prior to such annual meeting or the tenth day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such annual meeting is first made.

      The stockholders’ notice shall set forth, as to:

      The notice must be accompanied by a written consent of the proposed nominee to be named as a director.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

      Our directors who are not officers or employees of the Company are compensated for their services in the amount of $750 per meeting of the Board. In addition, effective January 1, 2005, the chairperson of the Audit Committee receives a retainer of $1,500 per month and the chairperson of the Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees each receives a retainer of $1,000 per month.

Vote Required

      If a quorum is present, the nominees receiving the highest number of votes will be elected to the Board of Directors. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the election of directors.

Recommendation of the Board

      The Board unanimously recommends that stockholders vote FOR election of each of the nominees identified above.

PROPOSAL 2

AMENDMENT OF 2004 STOCK OPTION PLAN

      On March 2, 2004, the Board approved the 2004 Plan, subject to approval from our stockholders, which approval was received at the 2004 Annual Meeting on May 24, 2004. At this time, the Board is asking our stockholders to approve an amendment to the 2004 Plan to increase the maximum number of shares of common stock that can be issued under the 2004 Plan from a total of 1,500,000 shares of common stock to 5,000,000 shares of common stock, or an increase of 3,500,000 shares.

      Given our limited cash reserves, we must rely on stock options to compensate and incentivize a number of individuals, including our directors, employees and consultants. We believe that this increase in the number of shares in the 2004 Plan will provide a sufficient number of shares to cover option grants for at least the next two years.

      All other terms of the 2004 Plan will remain unchanged. The following summary of the principal provisions of the 2004 Plan is qualified in its entirety by reference to the 2004 Plan itself.

      Purpose of the 2004 Plan. The 2004 Plan is intended to benefit and strengthen the Company and its stockholders by:

      Administration. A committee of three or more people selected by the Board administers the 2004 Plan. The Board has designated the Compensation Committee as the administrator of the 2004 Plan.

      Shares Available for Grant Under the Plan. As originally adopted by the stockholders at the 2004 Annual Meeting, the 2004 Plan contains a total of 1,500,000 shares of our common stock, subject to adjustment in the event of certain changes in our capitalization. The stockholders are being asked at the 2005 Annual Meeting to approve an increase in the total number of shares which can be the subject to grants under the 2004 Plan from 1,500,000 to 5,000,000, an increase of 3,500,000 shares. If an option terminates or expires for any reason without having vested and been exercised, the related shares of common stock will again become available for grant.

      Eligibility. All employees, directors, consultants and advisers of the Company are eligible to receive option grants under the 2004 Plan. As of April 8, 2005, three Named Executive Officers (as defined below on page 13), four non-employee directors and five other employees were eligible to be selected by the Compensation Committee to receive grants under the 2004 Plan.

      Types and Terms of Stock Options. The Compensation Committee may grant either incentive stock options qualified with respect to Internal Revenue Code Section 422 (“ISOs”) or options not qualified under any section of the Internal Revenue Code (“non-qualified options”). All ISOs granted under the 2004 Plan must have an exercise price that is at least equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the grant date and, in the case of a person who is a 10% or greater stockholder, the exercise price must be at least 100% of the fair marketing value of our common stock on the grant date. The exercise price of a non-qualified option shall be determined by the Board or the Compensation Committee. As of April 8, 2005, the fair market value of a share of our common stock, determined by the closing price per share on that date as quoted on Pink Sheets, was $1.00. No stock option granted under the 2004 Plan may have a term longer than ten years and, in the case of a person who is a 10% or greater stockholder, the stock option may not have a term longer than five years. The exercise price of stock options may be paid in cash, or, if the Compensation Committee permits, by tendering shares of common stock.

      Vesting. The Compensation Committee has the authority to determine the amounts and period of time over which a stock option shall become exercisable (vest). However, the fair market value with respect to which an ISO is exercisable by an optionee during any calendar year may not exceed $100,000.

      Stock Options Granted to Certain Individuals. The number of options that an individual may receive under the 2004 Plan will be in the discretion of the Compensation Committee and therefore cannot be determined in advance. The following table sets forth (a) the aggregate 1,172,652 shares subject to options granted during 2004, and (b) the average per share exercise price of such options:

      Federal Income Tax Consequences. The following summary is intended only as a general guide to the United States federal income tax consequences under current law of incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options, which are authorized for grant under the 2004 Plan. It does not attempt to describe all possible federal or other tax consequences of participation in the 2004 Plan or tax consequences based on particular circumstances. The tax consequences may vary if options are granted outside the United States.

      Transferability. All ISOs are non-transferable other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution and shall be exercisable during an optionee’s lifetime only by the optionee. The Compensation Committee may provide that a non-qualified option may be transferred under certain terms and conditions.

      Extraordinary Events. In the event of a sale of more than half the fair market value of the assets of the Company, the acquisition by a group or entity of more than 30% of the voting securities of the Company, or the dissolution or liquidation of the Company, all stock options not exercised shall terminate as of the date such transaction or event takes place, unless the stock options are assumed. The vesting of unvested stock options shall be accelerated in certain circumstances in connection with the acquisition of the assets or stock of the Company and the optionee shall be entitled to receive cash equal to the difference between the exercise price of the stock option and value of the consideration attributable to the transaction.

      Amendment and Termination. The Board or the Compensation Committee may suspend, amend or terminate the 2004 Plan at any time, but no such action may be taken without stockholder approval if such approval is required by law or if such action increases the maximum number of shares that may be issued under the 2004 Plan, reduces the exercise price of an ISO, increases the maximum term of an ISO or permits stock options to be granted to anyone not eligible to be granted options at the time of the adoption of the 2004 Plan. The Board may, with the consent of an optionee, make modifications of the terms and conditions of that person’s stock option, other than as described in the preceding sentence, in which case stockholder approval is also required.

Vote Required

      If a quorum is present, the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present and entitled to vote at the 2005 Annual Meeting will be required to approve the proposed amendment to the 2004 Plan. Abstentions will have the effect of a vote “against” the approval of the proposed amendment to the 2004 Plan. Broker non-votes will not be considered as present and entitled to vote on this proposal but will be counted as present for the purpose of determining a quorum.

Recommendation of the Board

      The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that stockholders vote “FOR” the amendment of the 2004 Plan.

PROPOSAL 3

RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

      The Audit Committee has selected Weinberg & Company, P.A. to audit our financial statements for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2005. Although ratification by stockholders is not required by law, the Board has determined that it is desirable to request ratification of this selection by the stockholders. Notwithstanding its selection, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may appoint new independent auditors at any time during the year if the Audit Committee believes that such a change would be in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders. If the stockholders do not ratify the appointment of Weinberg & Company, P.A. the Audit Committee may reconsider its selection.

      Weinberg & Company, P.A. was first appointed in fiscal year 2003, and has audited our financial statements for fiscal years 2002 through 2004. Certain additional information regarding changes in our independent auditor in 2003 can be found in Part II, Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, a copy of which accompanies this proxy statement.

      The Board expects that representatives of Weinberg & Company, P.A. will be present at the 2005 Annual Meeting to respond to appropriate questions and to make a statement if they so desire.

Audit and Other Fees

      The following table summarizes the fees charged by Weinberg & Company, P.A. for certain services rendered to the Company during 2003 and 2004. Weinberg & Company, P.A. was retained in December 2003 to audit the Company’s financial statements for fiscal years 2002 and 2003. Because of the date of the engagement, Weinberg & Company, P.A. did not commence its audit services until early 2004. Accordingly, no fees were billed by Weinberg & Company, P.A. to the Company in 2003.

Vote Required

      If a quorum is present, the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present and entitled to vote at the 2005 Annual Meeting will be required to ratify the appointment of Weinberg & Company, P.A. as our independent auditors. Abstentions will have the effect of a vote “against” the ratification of Weinberg & Company, P.A. as our independent auditors. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.

Recommendation of the Board

      The Board unanimously recommends that stockholders vote FOR the proposal to ratify the appointment of Weinberg & Co. , P.A. as our independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2005.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

      The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of April 8, 2005 by:

      As of April 8, 2005, there were 38,450,321 shares of our common stock outstanding.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

      The following table sets forth certain information regarding the compensation earned during the last three fiscal years by the Named Executive Officers:

Summary Compensation Table

OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR

      The following table sets forth information concerning the stock option grants made to each of the Named Executive Officers during the 2004 fiscal year. No stock appreciation rights were granted to any of the Named Executive Officers during the 2004 fiscal year.

AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR

AND YEAR-END OPTION VALUES

      No options were exercised by any of the Named Executive Officers during the 2004 fiscal year. No stock appreciation rights were exercised by any of the Named Executive Officers during the 2004 fiscal year. The following table sets forth the number of shares of our common stock subject to exercisable and unexercisable stock options which the Named Executive Officers held at the end of the 2004 fiscal year.

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION FOR 2004

      The following table sets forth information regarding outstanding options and shares reserved for future issuance under our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2004:

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS

      Agreement with Edward L. Masry. On December 1, 2003, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Edward L. Masry, pursuant to which he serves as our Chief Executive Officer. The initial term of the agreement expires on December 31, 2007 and renews automatically for additional one-year terms unless either party has given notice of non-extension prior to the end of a term. The agreement provides for a base compensation of $1 per year. Mr. Masry is eligible to participate in the Company’s incentive and benefit plans, including eligibility to receive grants of stock options under the 2004 Plan.

      If Mr. Masry’s employment is terminated by us without cause or as a result of his disability or death, he or his estate, as the case may be, will be entitled to receive an amount equal to the greater of the aggregate bonus(es), if any, paid to him with respect to one of the two years immediately preceding the year in which the termination occurs. In addition, Mr. Masry and his dependents will be entitled to continue to participate at the same levels in the Company’s benefit plans for a period of one year.

      If Mr. Masry’s employment is terminated by him for good reason or as a result of a change of control, he will be entitled to receive all accrued salary, bonus and benefits for a period of three years from the date of termination. If Mr. Masry’s employment is terminated by us for cause or by Mr. Masry without good reason, he will only be entitled to receive accrued salary and benefits through the date of termination. The agreement also contains standard confidentiality and non-solicitation provisions.

      Agreement with Eugene E. Eichler. On December 1, 2003, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Eugene E. Eichler, pursuant to which he originally served as our Chief Operating Officer. Since March 2, 2004, Mr. Eichler has served as our President and Chief Financial Officer and his employment agreement was amended accordingly. The initial term of the agreement expires on December 31, 2007 and renews automatically for additional one-year terms unless either party has given notice of non-extension prior to the end of a term. Under the agreement, as amended, Mr. Eichler was paid base compensation of $192,000 per annum through March 1, 2004 and $240,000 per annum effective March 2, 2004. The base compensation is reviewable by the Board in subsequent years of the term. Mr. Eichler is also eligible to participate in the Company’s incentive and benefit plans, including eligibility to receive grants of stock options under the 2004 Plan.

      If Mr. Eichler’s employment is terminated by us without cause or as a result of his disability or death, he or his estate, as the case may be, will be entitled to receive an amount equal to the greater of (i) his highest base compensation paid to him with respect to one of the two years immediately preceding the year in which the termination occurs or (ii) his base compensation in effect immediately prior to the date of termination, for a period of one year beginning on the date of termination. In addition, he will be entitled to receive an amount equal to the greater of the aggregate bonus(es), if any, paid to him with respect to one of the two years immediately preceding the year in which the termination occurs. Mr. Eichler and his dependents will be entitled to continue to participate at the same levels in the Company’s benefit plans for a period of one year.

      If Mr. Eichler’s employment is terminated by him for good reason or as a result of a change of control, he will be entitled to receive all accrued salary, bonus and benefits for a period of three years from the date of termination. If Mr. Eichler’s employment is terminated by us for cause or by Mr. Eichler without good reason, he will only be entitled to receive accrued salary and benefits through the date of termination. The agreement also contains standard confidentiality and non-solicitation provisions.

      Agreement with Bruce H. McKinnon. On December 1, 2003, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Bruce H. McKinnon, pursuant to which he originally served as our Executive Vice President of Business Development. Since March 2, 2004, Mr. McKinnon has served as our Chief Operating Officer and his employment agreement was amended accordingly. The initial term of the agreement expires on December 31, 2007 and renews automatically for additional one-year terms unless either party has given notice of non-extension prior to the end of a term. Under the agreement, as amended, Mr. McKinnon was paid base compensation of $153,600 per annum through March 1, 2004 and $192,000 per annum effective March 2, 2004. The base compensation is reviewable by the Board in subsequent years of the term. Mr. McKinnon is

also eligible to participate in the Company’s incentive and benefit plans, including eligibility to receive grants of stock options under the 2004 Plan.

      If Mr. McKinnon’s employment is terminated by us without cause or as a result of his disability or death, he, or his estate as the case may be, will be entitled to receive an amount equal to the greater of (i) his highest base compensation paid to him with respect to one of the two years immediately preceding the year in which the termination occurs or (ii) his base compensation in effect immediately prior to the date of termination, for a period of one year beginning on the date of termination. In addition, he will be entitled to receive an amount equal to the greater of the aggregate bonus(es), if any, paid to him with respect to one of the two years immediately preceding the year in which the termination occurs. Mr. McKinnon and his dependents will be entitled to continue to participate at the same levels in the Company’s benefit plans for a period of one year.

      If Mr. McKinnon’s employment is terminated by him for good reason or as a result of a change of control, he will be entitled to receive all accrued salary, bonus and benefits for a period of three years from the date of termination. If Mr. McKinnon’s employment is terminated by us for cause or by Mr. McKinnon without good reason, he will only be entitled to receive accrued salary and benefits through the date of termination. The agreement also contains standard confidentiality and non-solicitation provisions.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

      During 2002, we entered into an agreement with Edward L. Masry, our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, for the reimbursement of a $500,000 loan made to us by Masry & Vititoe, PC, in which Mr. Masry is a shareholder. In June 2003, we repaid this loan in full by issuing 2,000,000 shares of our common stock at a price per share of $0.25 and warrants to purchase 2,000,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share, exercisable for a five-year period. In April 2004, we issued 60,000 shares of our common stock in consideration of the cancellation of a loan in the amount of $15,000 made to us by Joette Masry, the wife of Edward L. Masry.

      In October 2003, we entered into a lease agreement with KZ Golf, Inc. to lease office space for our primary administrative facility. Jennifer J. King, the wife of Bruce H. McKinnon, our Chief Operating Officer and one of our directors, is the indirect principal stockholder of KZ Golf, Inc. Through May 31, 2004, we paid rent in the amount of $2,000 per month for approximately 1,000 square feet. Effective June 1, 2004, we amended the lease to add approximately 225 square feet of office space and to have provided expanded comprehensive services, including reception, parking and conference facilities, for a total rent of $3,400 per month. The lease, as amended, is renewable, at our option, for an additional two-year term at $3,760 per month.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

      The following Report of the Compensation Committee and the Performance Graph that follows do not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any of our other filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate this report or the performance graph by reference therein.

      The Compensation Committee has furnished this report on executive compensation for the 2004 fiscal year.

      The Compensation Committee administers the Company’s executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee has the authority to review and determine the salaries and bonuses of the executive officers of the Company, including the Chief Executive Officer and the other executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table (the “Named Executive Officers”) appearing elsewhere in this proxy statement, and to establish the general compensation policies for such individuals. The Compensation Committee also has the sole and exclusive authority to make discretionary option grants to all of the Company’s employees under the Company’s 2004 Stock Option Plan (the “2004 Plan”).

      The Compensation Committee operates under a written charter. The charter reflects these various responsibilities, and the Committee is charged with periodically reviewing the charter. In addition, the Committee has the authority to engage the services of outside advisors, experts and others, including independent compensation consultants who do not advise the Company, to assist the Committee. The Compensation Committee met two times during 2004.

      The Compensation Committee believes that the compensation programs for the Company’s executive officers should reflect the Company’s performance and the value created for the Company’s stockholders. In addition, the compensation programs should support the short-term and long-term strategic goals and values of the Company, reward individual contribution to the Company’s success and align the interests of the Company’s officers with the interests of its stockholders. The committee believes that the Company’s success depends upon its ability to attract and retain qualified executives through the competitive compensation packages it offers to such individuals.

      The principal factors that were taken into account in establishing each executive officer’s compensation package for the 2004 fiscal year are described below. However, the Compensation Committee may in its discretion apply entirely different factors, such as different measures of financial performance, for future fiscal years. Moreover, all of the Company’s Named Executive Officers have entered into employment agreements with the Company and many components of each such person’s compensation is set by such agreements.

      Chief Executive Officer Compensation. We entered into an employment agreement with Edward L. Masry in December 2003, under which his base compensation will be $1 per year for each year of the term of the agreement, commencing in 2004. Mr. Masry served as our President until March 1, 2004 and as our Chief Executive Officer for all of 2004. Mr. Masry’s principal compensation came from his law firm, Masry & Vititoe PC. Because of the terms of Mr. Masry’s employment agreement, the Compensation Committee did not consider specific factors in connection with Mr. Masry’s compensation. Because the Company is in the development stage, the Compensation Committee did not award a bonus to Mr. Masry for 2004.

      Other Executive Officer Compensation. On December 1, 2003, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Eugene E. Eichler, pursuant to which he originally served as our Chief Operating Officer. Since March 2, 2004, Mr. Eichler has served as our President and Chief Financial Officer and his employment agreement was amended accordingly. The initial term of the agreement expires on December 31, 2007 and renews automatically for additional one-year terms unless either party has given notice of non-extension prior to the end of a term. Under the agreement, as amended, Mr. Eichler was paid base compensation of $192,000 per annum through March 1, 2004 and $240,000 per annum effective March 2, 2004.

      On December 1, 2003, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Bruce H. McKinnon, pursuant to which he originally served as our Executive Vice President of Business Development. Since March 2, 2004, Mr. McKinnon has served as our Chief Operating Officer and his employment agreement was amended accordingly. The initial term of the agreement expires on December 31, 2007 and renews automatically for additional one-year terms unless either party has given notice of non-extension prior to the end of a term. Under the agreement, as amended, Mr. McKinnon was paid base compensation of $153,600 per annum through March 1, 2004 and $$192,000 per annum effective March 2, 2004.

      On September 1, 2004, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Erin Brockovich, pursuant to which she serves as our Vice President of Environmental Affairs. The initial term of the agreement expires on September 30, 2005 and renews automatically for additional one-year terms unless either party has given notice of non-extension prior to the end of a term. The agreement provides for base compensation of $60,000 per annum.

      Our other executive officers were paid relatively nominal amounts of base compensation in 2004, reflecting the development stage of the Company. Because the Company is in the development stage, the Compensation Committee also did not award a bonus to any of our executive officers for 2004.

      Equity-Based Compensation. The Committee believes in linking long-term incentives to an increase in stock value. Accordingly, it awards stock options under the 2004 Plan with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the underlying stock on the date of grant that vest and become exercisable over time. The Committee believes that these options encourage employees to continue to use their best efforts and to remain in the Company’s employ. Options granted to executive officers under the 2004 Plan generally vest and become exercisable in annual 25% increments over a four-year period after grant.

      The Committee relies substantially on management of the Company to make specific recommendations regarding which individuals should receive option grants and the amounts of such grants. In 2004, the Committee granted 922,652 options to all employees, with 852,652, or 92.4%, of such amount being granted to Named Executive Officers. The Named Executive Officers were individually awarded the number of stock options shown in the table headed “Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year” appearing elsewhere in this proxy statement.

      The Company granted stock options to executive officers with a cumulative option price of up to $100,000 as incentive stock options and the remainder as non-qualified stock options, both with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Accordingly, those stock options will have value only if the market price of the Company’s common stock increases after that date. In determining the size of stock option grants to executive officers, the Committee bases its decisions on such considerations as similar awards to individuals holding comparable positions in our comparative groups, company performance and individual performance, as well as the allocation of overall share usage attributed to executive officers.

      Compliance with Code Section 162(m). Section 162(m) of the Code disallows a tax deduction to publicly-held companies for compensation paid to certain of their executive officers, to the extent that compensation exceeds $1 million per covered officer in any fiscal year. The limitation applies only to compensation which is not considered to be performance based. Non-performance based compensation paid to the Company’s executive officers for the 2003 fiscal year did not exceed the $1 million limit per officer, and the Compensation Committee does not anticipate that the non-performance based compensation to be paid to the Company’s executive officers for the 2004 fiscal year will exceed that limit. Because it is unlikely that the cash compensation payable to any of the Company’s executive officers in the foreseeable future will approach the $1 million limit, the Compensation Committee has decided at this time not to take any action to limit or restructure the elements of cash compensation payable to the Company’s executive officers. The Compensation Committee will reconsider this decision should the individual cash non-performance based compensation of any executive officer ever approach the $1 million level.

      The Board did not modify any action or recommendation made by the Compensation Committee with respect to executive compensation for the 2004 fiscal year. It is the opinion of the Compensation Committee that the executive compensation policies and plans provide the necessary total remuneration program to properly align the Company’s performance and the interests of the Company’s stockholders through the use of competitive and equitable executive compensation in a balanced and reasonable manner, for both the short and long term.

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

      The following report of the Audit Committee does not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any of our other filings under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate this report by reference therein, and shall not be deemed to be soliciting material or otherwise deemed filed under either such Act.

      The Audit Committee is currently composed of four directors, two of whom are independent. The duties and responsibilities of a member of the Audit Committee are in addition to his duties as a member of the Board.

      The Audit Committee operates under a written charter, which is available on the Company’s website. The Board and the Audit Committee believe that the Audit Committee charter complies with the current standards set forth in SEC regulations. There may be further action by the SEC during the current year on several matters that affect all audit committees. The Board and the Audit Committee continue to follow closely further developments by the SEC in the area of the functions of audit committees, particularly as it relates to internal controls for non-accelerated filers, and will make additional changes to the Audit Committee charter and the policies of the Audit Committee as required or advisable as a result of these new rules and regulations. The Audit Committee met four times during 2004.

      The Audit Committee’s primary duties and responsibilities are to:

      Management is responsible for the Company’s internal controls and the financial reporting process. The Company’s independent auditor is responsible for performing an independent audit of the Company’s financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and issuing a report thereon. The Audit Committee’s responsibility is to monitor and oversee these processes.

      The Company is planning to form an internal management group, reporting to the Chief Executive Officer and the Audit Committee, that is charged with guiding the Company in meeting the various requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Audit Committee has begun to implement procedures to ensure that during the course of each fiscal year it devotes the attention that it deems necessary or appropriate to each of the matters assigned to it under its charter.

      In overseeing the preparation of the Company’s financial statements, the Audit Committee held meetings with the Company’s independent auditors, both in the presence of management and privately, to discuss the overall scope and plans for their audit, review and discuss all financial statements prior to their issuance, and discuss significant accounting issues. Management advised the Audit Committee that all financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and the Audit Committee discussed the statements with both management and the Company’s independent auditors. In accordance with Section 204 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Statement on Auditing Standards (“SAS”) No. 61 (Communication With Audit Committees) as amended by SAS No. 90 (Audit Committee Communications), the Audit Committee has discussed with the Company’s independent auditors all matters required under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the foregoing standards.

      With respect to the Company’s independent auditors, the Audit Committee, among other things, discussed with Weinberg & Co., P.A., matters relating to its independence, including the written disclosures made to the Audit Committee as required by the Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1

(Independence Discussions with Audit Committees). The Audit Committee also reviewed and approved the audit and non-audit fees of that firm.

      On the basis of these reviews and discussions, the Audit Committee (i) appointed Weinberg & Co., P.A. as the independent registered public accounting firm for the 2005 fiscal year and (ii) recommended to the Board that the Board approve the inclusion of the Company’s audited financial statements in the 10-KSB for filing with the SEC.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

      Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers and holders of more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our common stock and our other equity securities. Directors, executive officers and greater than 10% stockholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file. Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms received by us, or written representation from certain reporting persons that no Form 5s were required for those persons, we believe that all reporting requirements under Section 16(a) for the 2004 fiscal year were met in a timely manner by our directors, executive officers and greater than 10% beneficial owners, except as follows. Mr. Masry did not make two filings on Form 4 with respect to (i) the March 2004 grant of options to purchase 328,740 shares of our common stock and (ii) the acquisition by his wife of 60,000 shares of our common stock in April of 2004. Mr. Eichler did not make a filing on Form 4 with respect to the March 2004 grant of options to purchase 286,956 shares of our common stock. Mr. McKinnon did not make a filing on Form 4 with respect to the March 2004 grant of options to purchase 236,956 shares of our common stock. Mr. Brown did not make a filing on Form 4 with respect to the March 2004 grant of options to purchase 50,000 shares of our common stock. Mr. Helleis did not make a filing on Form 4 with respect to the March 2004 grant of options to purchase 50,000 shares of our common stock. Mr. Price did not make a filing on Form 4 with respect to the March 2004 grant of options to purchase 50,000 shares of our common stock. Mr. Sylk did not make a filing on Form 4 with respect to the March 2004 grant of options to purchase 50,000 shares of our common stock. Mr. Shelton did not make a filing on Form 4 with respect to the March 2004 grant of options to purchase 50,000 shares of our common stock. Ms. Holder did not make a filing on Form 4 with respect to the March 2004 grant of options to purchase 10,000 shares of our common stock. Ms. Brockovich did not make a filing on Form 3 at the time of her appointment in September 2004 as our Vice President of Environmental Affairs. Each of such officers and directors has since filed one Form 5 reporting their respective transactions described above.

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

      From time to time stockholders present proposals that may be proper subjects for inclusion in a proxy statement and for consideration at an annual meeting. Under the rules of the SEC, to be included in the proxy statement for our 2006 annual meeting of stockholders, proposals must be received by us no later than January 10, 2006.

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB

      We filed our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB with the SEC on April 27, 2005. A copy of the 10-KSB, without exhibits, has been mailed to all stockholders along with this proxy statement. Stockholders may obtain additional copies of the 10-KSB and the exhibits thereto, without charge, by writing to the Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices at 5125 Lankershim Boulevard, North Hollywood, California 91601.

OTHER MATTERS

      Management does not know of any matters to be presented at the 2005 Annual Meeting other than those set forth herein and in the Notice accompanying this proxy statement. If a stockholder vote is necessary to transact any other business at the 2005 Annual Meeting, the proxyholders intend to vote their proxies in accordance with their best judgment related to such business.

      It is important that your shares be represented at the 2005 Annual Meeting, regardless of the number of shares that you hold. YOU ARE, THEREFORE, URGED TO EXECUTE PROMPTLY AND RETURN THE ACCOMPANYING PROXY IN THE ENVELOPE THAT HAS BEEN ENCLOSED FOR YOUR

CONVENIENCE. Stockholders who are present at the 2005 Annual Meeting may revoke their proxies and vote in person or, if they prefer, may abstain from voting in person and allow their proxies to be voted.

April 29, 2005

North Hollywood, California

SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC.

2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

May 24, 2005

10:00 am

Sheraton Universal Hotel

333 Universal Hollywood Drive

Universal City, CA 91608

Phone: (818) 980-1212

Directions from Los Angeles International Airport (LAX):

Directions from Downtown Los Angeles:

 

6 DETACH PROXY CARD HERE 6