10QSB: Optional form for quarterly and transition reports of small business issuers
Published on August 14, 2006
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-QSB
o | QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006
or
o | TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 0-29185
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Nevada | 52-2088326 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer | |
incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) |
5125 Lankershim Boulevard
North Hollywood, California 91601
(Address, including zip code, of principal executive offices)
(818) 487-8000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
North Hollywood, California 91601
(Address, including zip code, of principal executive offices)
(818) 487-8000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None.
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: Common Stock, $0.001 par value.
Check whether the Registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The number of shares of the Registrants Common Stock outstanding as of August 7, 2006 was
39,112,631 shares.
Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check one): Yes o No þ
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC.
FORM 10-QSB
INDEX
INDEX
Page | ||||||||
1 | ||||||||
1 | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
11 | ||||||||
13 | ||||||||
34 | ||||||||
39 | ||||||||
41 | ||||||||
43 | ||||||||
43 | ||||||||
44 | ||||||||
44 | ||||||||
45 | ||||||||
46 | ||||||||
47 | ||||||||
EXHIBIT 10.1 | ||||||||
EXHIBIT 10.2 | ||||||||
EXHIBIT 31.1 | ||||||||
EXHIBIT 31.2 | ||||||||
EXHIBIT 32 |
i
Table of Contents
PART I
Item 1. Financial Statements
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, 2006 | December 31, | |||||||
(unaudited) | 2005 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets |
||||||||
Cash |
$ | 1,628,517 | $ | 279,821 | ||||
Inventory |
3,719 | | ||||||
Other current assets |
122,588 | 9,009 | ||||||
Total current assets |
1,754,824 | 288,830 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation |
367,272 | 295,374 | ||||||
Other assets |
4,500 | 4,500 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 2,126,596 | $ | 588,704 | ||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
Table of Contents
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS Continued
June 30, 2006 | December 31, | |||||||
(unaudited) | 2005 | |||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIENCY |
||||||||
Current liabilities |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 117,942 | $ | 155,456 | ||||
Accrued expenses |
178,582 | 179,461 | ||||||
Accrued research and development fees |
495,000 | 680,000 | ||||||
Accrued professional fees |
501,732 | 450,555 | ||||||
Payable to shareholder |
| 45,000 | ||||||
Payable to related parties |
| 158,732 | ||||||
Finders fees payable |
4,666 | 8,916 | ||||||
Convertible debentures, net |
983,863 | 318,759 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
2,281,785 | 1,996,879 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
Stockholders deficiency |
||||||||
Common stock, $.001 par value: 200,000,000 shares
authorized, 37,360,368 and 31,387,418 shares issued
and outstanding at June 30, 2006 and December 31,
2005, respectively |
37,360 | 31,387 | ||||||
Common stock to be issued |
47,722 | 612,521 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
25,996,133 | 18,336,178 | ||||||
Deferred compensation |
| (142,187 | ) | |||||
Deficit accumulated during the development stage |
(26,236,404 | ) | (20,246,074 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders deficiency |
(155,189 | ) | (1,408,175 | ) | ||||
Total liabilities and stockholders deficiency |
$ | 2,126,596 | $ | 588,704 | ||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 AND 2005 AND FOR THE
PERIOD FROM INCEPTION (FEBRUARY 18, 1998) TO JUNE 30, 2006
THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 AND 2005 AND FOR THE
PERIOD FROM INCEPTION (FEBRUARY 18, 1998) TO JUNE 30, 2006
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | Cumulative | ||||||||||||||||||
since | ||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | inception | ||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | | $ | | $ | $ | | $ | | |||||||||||
Operating expenses |
1,852,870 | 583,310 | 3,607,840 | 1,244,905 | 19,098,589 | |||||||||||||||
Research and development expenses |
121,111 | 190,637 | 178,873 | 592,122 | 3,982,460 | |||||||||||||||
Non-cash patent settlement costs |
| | | | 1,610,066 | |||||||||||||||
Loss before other income (expense) |
(1,973,981 | ) | (773,947 | ) | (3,786,713 | ) | (1,837,027 | ) | (24,691,115 | ) | ||||||||||
Other income (expense) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Other income |
125 | | 125 | | 125 | |||||||||||||||
Interest income |
6,976 | | 6,976 | | 7,930 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(1,025,345 | ) | (570 | ) | (2,209,918 | ) | (570 | ) | (2,564,583 | ) | ||||||||||
Settlement of litigation debt |
| | | | 1,017,208 | |||||||||||||||
Loss before provision for income taxes |
(2,992,225 | ) | (774,517 | ) | (5,989,530 | ) | (1,837,597 | ) | (26,230,435 | ) | ||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
| | 800 | 1,976 | 5,969 | |||||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (2,992,225 | ) | $ | (774,517 | ) | $ | (5,990,330 | ) | $ | (1,839,573 | ) | $ | (26,236,404 | ) | |||||
Net loss per share, basic and diluted |
$ | (0.09 | ) | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | (0.18 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | ||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding, basic and diluted |
33,661,360 | 38,528,563 | 32,816,890 | 38,283,771 | ||||||||||||||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIENCY
FROM INCEPTION (FEBRUARY 18, 1998) TO JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
FROM INCEPTION (FEBRUARY 18, 1998) TO JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
Additional | Deficit accumulated | Total stockholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Price per | Common Stock | Common stock | paid-in | Deferred | during the | development | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
share | Shares | Amount | to be issued | capital | compensation | development stage | stage deficiency | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, February 18, 1998 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(date of inception) |
| $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | |||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock on April 18, 1998 |
.0015 .01 | 10,030,000 | 10,030 | | 14,270 | | | 24,300 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | | | (21,307 | ) | (21,307 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 1998 |
10,030,000 | 10,030 | 14,270 | | (21,307 | ) | 2,993 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock on May 18, 1999 |
1.00 6.40 | 198,003 | 198 | | 516,738 | | | 516,936 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock for ZEFS on September 14, 1999 |
.001 | 5,000,000 | 5,000 | | | | | 5,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for professional services on May 18, 1999 |
0.88 | 69,122 | 69 | | 49,444 | | | 49,513 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | | | (1,075,264 | ) | (1,075,264 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 1999 |
15,297,125 | 15,297 | | 580,452 | | (1,096,571 | ) | (500,822 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for employee compensation on February 8, 2000 |
1.03 | 20,000 | 20 | | 20,580 | | | 20,600 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for consulting services on February 8, 2000 |
1.03 | 100,000 | 100 | | 102,900 | | | 103,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for professional services on April 18, 2000 |
3.38 | 27,000 | 27 | | 91,233 | | | 91,260 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for directors fees on April 18, 2000 |
3.38 | 50,000 | 50 | | 168,950 | | | 169,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for professional services on May 19, 2000 |
4.06 | 5,000 | 5 | | 20,295 | | | 20,300 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for directors fees on June 20, 2000 |
4.44 | 6,000 | 6 | | 26,634 | | | 26,640 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for professional services on June 20, 2000 |
4.44 | 1,633 | 2 | | 7,249 | | | 7,251 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for professional services on June 26, 2000 |
5.31 | 1,257 | 1 | | 6,674 | | | 6,675 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for employee compensation on June 26, 2000 |
5.31 | 22,000 | 22 | | 116,798 | | | 116,820 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for consulting services on June 26, 2000 |
5.31 | 9,833 | 10 | | 52,203 | | | 52,213 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for promotional services on July 28, 2000 |
4.88 | 9,675 | 9 | | 47,205 | | | 47,214 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for consulting services on July 28, 2000 |
4.88 | 9,833 | 10 | | 47,975 | | | 47,985 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for consulting services on August 4, 2000 |
2.13 | 35,033 | 35 | | 74,585 | | | 74,620 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for promotional services on August 16, 2000 |
2.25 | 25,000 | 25 | | 56,225 | | | 56,250 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for consulting services on September 5, 2000 |
2.25 | 12,833 | 13 | | 28,861 | | | 28,874 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for consulting services on September 10, 2000 |
1.50 | 9,833 | 10 | | 14,740 | | | 14,750 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for consulting services on November 2, 2000 |
0.88 | 9,833 | 10 | | 8,643 | | | 8,653 |
4
Table of Contents
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIENCY - Continued
FROM INCEPTION (FEBRUARY 18, 1998) TO JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
FROM INCEPTION (FEBRUARY 18, 1998) TO JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
Additional | Deficit accumulated | Total stockholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Price per | Common Stock | Common stock | paid-in | Deferred | during the | development | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
share | Shares | Amount | to be issued | capital | compensation | development stage | stage deficiency | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for consulting services on November 4, 2000 |
0.88 | 9,833 | 10 | | 8,643 | | | 8,653 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for consulting services on December 20, 2000 |
0.50 | 19,082 | 19 | | 9,522 | | | 9,541 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for filing services on December 20, 2000 |
0.50 | 5,172 | 5 | | 2,581 | | | 2,586 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for professional services on December 26, 2000 |
0.38 | 12,960 | 13 | | 4,912 | | | 4,925 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other stock issuance on August 24, 2000 |
2.13 | 2,000 | 2 | | 4,258 | | | 4,260 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common shares cancelled |
(55,000 | ) | (55 | ) | | (64,245 | ) | | | (64,300 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | | | (1,270,762 | ) | (1,270,762 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2000 |
15,645,935 | 15,646 | | 1,437,873 | | (2,367,333 | ) | (913,814 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for consulting services on January 8, 2001 |
0.31 | 9,833 | 10 | | 3,038 | | | 3,048 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for consulting services on February 1, 2001 |
0.33 | 9,833 | 10 | | 3,235 | | | 3,245 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for consulting services on March 1, 2001 |
0.28 | 9,833 | 10 | | 2,743 | | | 2,753 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for legal services on March 13, 2001 |
0.32 | 150,000 | 150 | | 47,850 | | | 48,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for consulting services on April 3, 2001 |
0.25 | 9,833 | 10 | | 2,448 | | | 2,458 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for legal services on April 4, 2001 |
0.25 | 30,918 | 31 | | 7,699 | | | 7,730 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for professional services on April 4, 2001 |
0.25 | 7,040 | 7 | | 1,753 | | | 1,760 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for consulting services on April 5, 2001 |
0.25 | 132,600 | 132 | | 33,018 | | | 33,150 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for filing fees on April 30, 2001 |
1.65 | 1,233 | 1 | | 2,033 | | | 2,034 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for filing fees on September 19, 2001 |
0.85 | 2,678 | 2 | | 2,274 | | | 2,276 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for professional services on September 28, 2001 |
0.62 | 150,000 | 150 | | 92,850 | | | 93,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for directors services on October 5, 2001 |
0.60 | 100,000 | 100 | | 59,900 | | | 60,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for legal services on October 17, 2001 |
0.60 | 11,111 | 11 | | 6,655 | | | 6,666 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for consulting services on October 18, 2001 |
0.95 | 400,000 | 400 | | 379,600 | | | 380,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for consulting services on October 19, 2001 |
1.25 | 150,000 | 150 | | 187,350 | | | 187,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for exhibit fees on October 22, 2001 |
1.35 | 5,000 | 6 | | 6,745 | | | 6,751 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for directors services on November 2, 2001 |
0.95 | 1,000,000 | 1,000 | | 949,000 | | | 950,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for consulting services on November 7, 2001 |
0.85 | 20,000 | 20 | | 16,980 | | | 17,000 |
5
Table of Contents
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIENCY - Continued
FROM INCEPTION (FEBRUARY 18, 1998) TO JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
FROM INCEPTION (FEBRUARY 18, 1998) TO JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
Additional | Deficit accumulated | Total stockholders' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Price per | Common Stock | Common stock | paid-in | Deferred | during the | development | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
share | Shares | Amount | to be issued | capital | compensation | development stage | stage deficiency | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for consulting services on November 20, 2001 |
0.98 | 43,000 | 43 | | 42,097 | | | 42,140 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for consulting services on November 27, 2001 |
0.98 | 10,000 | 10 | | 9,790 | | | 9,800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for consulting services on November 28, 2001 |
0.98 | 187,000 | 187 | | 183,073 | | | 183,260 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Intrinsic value of options issued to employees |
| | | 2,600,000 | (2,600,000 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair value of options issued to non-employees for services |
| | | 142,318 | | | 142,318 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of deferred compensation |
| | | | 191,667 | | 191,667 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | | | (2,735,013 | ) | (2,735,013 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2001 |
18,085,847 | 18,086 | | 6,220,322 | (2,408,333 | ) | (5,102,346 | ) | (1,272,271 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for directors services on December 10, 2002 |
0.40 | 2,150,000 | 2,150 | | 857,850 | | | 860,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock paid for, but not issued (2,305,000 shares) |
0.15-0.25 | | | 389,875 | | | | 389,875 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair value of options issued to non-employees for services |
| | | 54,909 | (54,909 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of deferred compensation |
| | | | 891,182 | | 891,182 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2002 |
| | | | | (2,749,199 | ) | (2,749,199 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2002 |
20,235,847 | 20,236 | 389,875 | 7,133,081 | (1,572,060 | ) | (7,851,545 | ) | (1,880,413 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued, previously paid for |
0.15 | 1,425,000 | 1,425 | (213,750 | ) | 212,325 | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued, previously paid for |
0.25 | 880,000 | 880 | (220,000 | ) | 219,120 | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for cash on March 20, 2003 |
0.25 | 670,000 | 670 | | 166,830 | | | 167,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for cash on April 4, 2003 |
0.25 | 900,000 | 900 | | 224,062 | | | 224,962 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for cash on April 8, 2003 |
0.25 | 100,000 | 100 | | 24,900 | | | 25,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for cash on May 8, 2003 |
0.25 | 1,150,000 | 1,150 | | 286,330 | | | 287,480 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for cash on June 16, 2003 |
0.25 | 475,000 | 475 | | 118,275 | | | 118,750 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for legal services on June 27, 2003 |
0.55 | 83,414 | 83 | | 45,794 | | | 45,877 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Debt converted to stock on June 27, 2003 |
0.25 | 2,000,000 | 2,000 | | 498,000 | | | 500,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock and warrants issued for cash on July 11, 2003 |
0.25 | 519,000 | 519 | | 129,231 | | | 129,750 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock and warrants issued for cash on September 29, 2003 |
0.25 | 1,775,000 | 1,775 | | 441,976 | | | 443,751 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock and warrants issued for cash on October 21, 2003 |
0.25 | 1,845,000 | 1,845 | | 459,405 | | | 461,250 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock and warrants issued for cash on October 28, 2003 |
0.25 | 1,570,000 | 1,570 | | 390,930 | | | 392,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock and warrants issued for cash on November 19, 2003 |
0.25 | 500,000 | 500 | | 124,500 | | | 125,000 |
6
Table of Contents
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIENCY
FROM INCEPTION (FEBRUARY 18, 1998) TO JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED
FROM INCEPTION (FEBRUARY 18, 1998) TO JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED
Additional | Deficit accumulated | Total stockholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Price per | Common Stock | Common stock | paid-in | Deferred | during the | development | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
share | Shares | Amount | to be issued | capital | compensation | development stage | stage deficiency | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Finders fees related to stock issuances |
| | 43,875 | (312,582 | ) | | | (268,707 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock paid for, but not issued (25,000 shares) |
0.25 | | | 6,250 | | | | 6,250 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of deferred comp |
| | | | 863,727 | | 863,727 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss for year ended December 31, 2003 |
| | | | | (2,476,063 | ) | (2,476,063 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2003 |
34,128,261 | 34,128 | 6,250 | 10,162,177 | (708,333 | ) | (10,327,608 | ) | (833,386 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued, previously paid for |
0.25 | 25,000 | 25 | (6,250 | ) | 6,225 | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for director services on March 31, 2004 |
1.50 | 50,000 | 50 | | 74,950 | | | 75,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for finders fees on March 31, 2004 |
0.15 | 82,500 | 82 | | 12,293 | | | 12,375 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for finders fees on March 31, 2004 |
0.25 | 406,060 | 407 | | 101,199 | | | 101,606 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for services on April 2, 2004 |
1.53 | 65,000 | 65 | | 99,385 | | | 99,450 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Debt converted to stock on April 2, 2004 |
1.53 | 60,000 | 60 | | 91,740 | | | 91,800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued upon exercise of warrants on May 21, 2004 |
0.20 | 950,000 | 950 | | 189,050 | | | 190,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for directors services on June 8, 2004 |
1.70 | 600,000 | 600 | | 1,019,400 | | | 1,020,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for cash on August 25, 2004 |
1.00 | 550,000 | 550 | | 549,450 | | | 550,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued upon exercise of options on August 30, 2004 |
0.40 | 4,000 | 4 | | 1,596 | | | 1,600 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for cash on September 8, 2004 |
1.00 | 25,000 | 25 | | 24,975 | | | 25,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for consulting services on September 15, 2004 |
1.31 | 50,000 | 49 | | 65,451 | | | 65,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for patent settlement on September 22, 2004 |
1.24 | 20,000 | 20 | | 24,780 | | | 24,800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for research and development on October 6, 2004 |
1.40 | 65,000 | 65 | | 90,935 | | | 91,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for cash on October 6, 2004 |
1.00 | 25,000 | 25 | | 24,975 | | | 25,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for cash on October 15, 2004 |
1.00 | 150,000 | 150 | | 149,850 | | | 150,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued upon exercise of stock options on October 21, 2004 |
0.40 | 6,500 | 6 | | 2,594 | | | 2,600 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for cash on November 3, 2004 |
1.00 | 25,000 | 25 | | 24,975 | | | 25,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for cash on November 18, 2004 |
1.00 | 172,500 | 173 | | 172,327 | | | 172,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for cash on December 9, 2004 |
1.00 | 75,000 | 75 | | 74,925 | | | 75,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for cash on December 23, 2004 |
1.00 | 250,000 | 250 | | 249,750 | | | 250,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Finders fees related to stock issuances |
| | | | (88,384 | ) | | | (88,384 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock paid for, but not issued (119,000 shares) |
| | | 119,000 | | | | 119,000 |
7
Table of Contents
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIENCY
FROM INCEPTION (FEBRUARY 18, 1998) TO JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED
FROM INCEPTION (FEBRUARY 18, 1998) TO JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED
Additional | Deficit accumulated | Total stockholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Price per | Common Stock | Common stock | paid-in | Deferred | during the | development | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
share | Shares | Amount | to be issued | capital | compensation | development stage | stage deficiency | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Intrinsic value of options issued to employees |
| | | | 248,891 | (248,891 | ) | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair value of options issued to non-employees for services |
| | | | 55,381 | (55,381 | ) | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair value of warrants issued for settlement costs |
| | | 1,585,266 | | | 1,585,266 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair value of warrants issued to non-employees for services |
| | | | 28,872 | | | 28,872 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of deferred compensation |
| | | | | 936,537 | | 936,537 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss for year ended December 31, 2004 |
| | | | | | (6,803,280 | ) | (6,803,280 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2004 |
37,784,821 | 37,784 | 119,000 | 15,043,028 | (76,068 | ) | (17,130,888 | ) | (2,007,144 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued, previously paid for |
1.00 | 69,000 | 69 | (69,000 | ) | 68,931 | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued upon exercise of warrants, previously paid for |
1.00 | 50,000 | 50 | (50,000 | ) | 49,950 | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for cash on January 20, 2005 |
1.00 | 25,000 | 25 | | 24,975 | | | 25,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued upon exercise of warrants on January 31, 2005 |
0.40 | 500 | 1 | | 199 | | | 200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for cash on February 17, 2005 |
1.00 | 325,000 | 325 | | 324,675 | | | 325,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for cash on March 31, 2005 |
1.00 | 215,000 | 215 | | 214,785 | | | 215,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for cash on May 17, 2005 |
1.00 | 5,000 | 5 | | 4,995 | | | 5,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for cash on June 7, 2005 |
1.00 | 300,000 | 300 | | 299,700 | | | 300,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for cash on August 5, 2005 |
1.00 | 480,500 | 480 | | 480,020 | | | 480,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for cash on August 9, 2005 |
1.00 | 100,000 | 100 | | 99,900 | | | 100,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for cash on October 27, 2005 |
1.00 | 80,000 | 80 | | 79,920 | | | 80,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock cancelled on December 7, 2005 |
Various | (8,047,403 | ) | (8,047 | ) | | 8,047 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for settlement of payables on December 21, 2005 |
| | | 57,092 | | | | 57,092 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for settlement of payables on December 31, 2005 |
| | | 555,429 | | | | 555,429 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Finders fees related to stock issuances |
| | | | (109,840 | ) | | | (109,840 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Intrinsic value of options issued to employees |
| | | | 243,750 | (243,750 | ) | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair value of options issued for settlement costs |
| | | | 31,500 | | | 31,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair value of warrants issued for settlement costs |
| | | | 4,957 | | | 4,957 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair value of warrants issued to non-employees for services |
| | | | 13,505 | | | 13,505 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of deferred compensation |
| | | | | 177,631 | | 177,631 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warrants issued with convertible notes |
| | | | 756,768 | | | 756,768 |
8
Table of Contents
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIENCY - Continued
FROM INCEPTION (FEBRUARY 18, 1998) TO JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED
FROM INCEPTION (FEBRUARY 18, 1998) TO JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED
Additional | Deficit accumulated | Total stockholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Price per | Common Stock | Common stock | paid-in | Deferred | during the | development | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
share | Shares | Amount | to be issued | capital | compensation | development stage | stage deficiency | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Intrinsic value of beneficial conversion associated with convertible notes |
| | | | 696,413 | | | 696,413 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss for year ended December 31, 2005 |
| | | | | | (3,115,186 | ) | (3,115,186 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2005 |
31,387,418 | $ | 31,387 | $ | 612,521 | $ | 18,336,178 | $ | (142,187 | ) | $ | (20,246,074 | ) | $ | (1,408,175 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Stock issued, for previously settled payables (unaudited) |
| 846,549 | 847 | (612,521 | ) | 611,674 | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued upon exercise of warrants on March 23, 2006 (unaudited) |
1.50 | 25,000 | 25 | | 37,475 | | | 37,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued upon exercise of warrants on March 27, 2006 (unaudited) |
1.50 | 50,000 | 50 | | 74,950 | | | 75,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued upon exercise of warrants on March 27, 2006 (unaudited) |
0.50 | 25,000 | 25 | | 12,475 | | | 12,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued upon exercise of warrants on March 30, 2006 (unaudited) |
1.00 | 10,000 | 10 | | 9,990 | | | 10,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued upon exercise of warrants on April 10, 2006 (unaudited) |
0.50 | 36,250 | 36 | | 18,089 | | | 18,125 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued for convertible debt on April 10, 2006 (unaudited) |
0.70 | 269,600 | 270 | | 188,450 | | | 188,720 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for cash April 24, 2006 (unaudited) |
1.56 | 473,000 | 473 | | 737,408 | | | 737,881 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued upon exercise of warrants on April 26, 2006 (unaudited) |
0.50 | 125,000 | 125 | | 62,375 | | | 62,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued upon exercise of warrants on April 26, 2006 (unaudited) |
1.50 | 100,000 | 100 | | 149,900 | | | 150,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued for convertible debt on April 26, 2006 (unaudited) |
0.70 | 35,714 | 36 | | 24,964 | | | 25,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued upon exercise of warrants on May 6, 2006 (unaudited) |
0.50 | 200,000 | 200 | | 99,800 | | | 100,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued upon exercise of warrants on May 15, 2006 (unaudited) |
1.50 | 25,000 | 25 | | 37,475 | | | 37,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued upon exercise of warrants on May 15, 2006 (unaudited) |
0.50 | 50,000 | 50 | | 24,950 | | | 25,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for cash on June 7, 2006 (unaudited) |
1.89 | 873,018 | 872 | | 1,649,136 | | | 1,650,008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued for convertible debt on June 7, 2006 (unaudited) |
0.70 | 1,535,715 | 1,536 | | 1,073,464 | | | 1,075,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued upon exercise of warrants on June 8, 2006 (unaudited) |
0.50 | 900,000 | 900 | | 449,100 | | | 450,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued upon exercise of warrants on June 9, 2006 (unaudited) |
0.50 | 9,000 | 9 | | 4,491 | | | 4,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued upon exercise of warrants on June 23, 2006 (unaudited) |
0.50 | 150,000 | 150 | | 74,850 | | | 75,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued upon exercise of warrants on June 23, 2006 (unaudited) |
1.50 | 15,000 | 15 | | 22,485 | | | 22,500 |
9
Table of Contents
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIENCY
FROM INCEPTION (FEBRUARY 18, 1998) TO JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED
FROM INCEPTION (FEBRUARY 18, 1998) TO JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED
Additional | Deficit accumulated | Total stockholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Price per | Common Stock | Common stock | paid-in | Deferred | during the | development | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
share | Shares | Amount | to be issued | capital | compensation | development stage | stage deficiency | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued for convertible debt on June 30, 2006 (unaudited) |
0.70 | 219,104 | 219 | | 153,155 | | | 153,374 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock paid for, but not issued (unaudited) |
| | | 37,500 | | | | 37,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock for convertible notes converted to stock, but not issued (unaudited) |
| | | 10,222 | | | | 10,222 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair value of options issued to employees and officers (unaudited) |
| | | | 1,214,775 | | | 1,214,775 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair value of warrants issued for services (unaudited) |
| | | | 401,130 | | | 401,130 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Write off of deferred compensation (unaudited) |
| | | | (142,187 | ) | 142,187 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Warrants issued for consulting services (unaudited) |
| | | | 43,660 | | | 43,660 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warrants issued with convertible notes (unaudited) |
| | | | 290,248 | | | 290,248 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Intrinsic value of beneficial conversion associated with convertible notes (unaudited) |
| | | | 620,252 | | | 620,252 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Finders fees related to stock issuances |
| | | | (284,579 | ) | | | (284,579 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss for six months ended June 30, 2006 (unaudited) |
| | | | | | (5,990,330 | ) | (5,990,330 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, June 30, 2006 (unaudited) |
37,360,368 | $ | 37,360 | $ | 47,722 | $ | 25,996,133 | $ | | $ | (26,236,404 | ) | $ | (155,189 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
10
Table of Contents
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 AND 2005 AND FOR THE
PERIOD FROM INCEPTION (FEBRUARY 18, 1998) TO
JUNE 30, 2006
PERIOD FROM INCEPTION (FEBRUARY 18, 1998) TO
JUNE 30, 2006
Cumulative | ||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | since | ||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | inception | ||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (5,990,330 | ) | $ | (1,839,573 | ) | $ | (26,236,404 | ) | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net
cash
used in operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Write off of intangible assets |
| | 505,000 | |||||||||
Settlement of litigation and debt |
| | (1,017,208 | ) | ||||||||
Fair value of options and warrants
issued for
services |
1,659,565 | 13,505 | 1,844,260 | |||||||||
Issuance of common stock for services |
| | 4,668,102 | |||||||||
Issuance of options for legal
settlement |
| 31,500 | 31,500 | |||||||||
Issuance of warrants for legal
settlement |
| 4,957 | 4,957 | |||||||||
Patent acquisition cost |
| | 1,610,066 | |||||||||
Amortization of issuance cost |
2,113,825 | | 2,432,583 | |||||||||
Amortization of deferred compensation |
| 76,068 | 3,060,744 | |||||||||
Depreciation |
57,217 | 4,536 | 90,979 | |||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||||||
Inventory |
(3,719 | ) | | (3,719 | ) | |||||||
Prepaid expenses and other |
(113,579 | ) | (550 | ) | (122,588 | ) | ||||||
Other assets |
| | (4,500 | ) | ||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
(172,872 | ) | 363,261 | 2,137,862 | ||||||||
Net cash used in operating
activities |
(2,449,893 | ) | (1,346,296 | ) | (10,998,366 | ) | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities |
||||||||||||
Purchase of property and equipment |
(129,115 | ) | | (454,701 | ) | |||||||
Net cash used in investing
activities |
(129,115 | ) | | (454,701 | ) | |||||||
Cash flows from financing activities |
||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in payables to related
parties |
(158,732 | ) | 122,255 | 517,208 | ||||||||
Advances from founding executive officer |
| | 556,450 | |||||||||
Net proceeds from convertible debentures |
865,500 | | 2,318,683 | |||||||||
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock
and common stock issuable |
3,220,936 | 1,351,200 | 9,689,243 | |||||||||
Net cash provided by
financing activities |
3,927,704 | 1,473,455 | 13,081,584 | |||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash |
1,348,696 | 127,159 | 1,628,517 | |||||||||
Cash, beginning of period |
279,821 | 84,826 | | |||||||||
Cash, end of period |
$ | 1,628,517 | $ | 211,985 | $ | 1,628,517 | ||||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
11
Table of Contents
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS Continued
(UNAUDITED)
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 AND 2005 AND FOR THE
PERIOD FROM INCEPTION (FEBRUARY 18, 1998) TO
JUNE 30, 2006
(UNAUDITED)
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 AND 2005 AND FOR THE
PERIOD FROM INCEPTION (FEBRUARY 18, 1998) TO
JUNE 30, 2006
Cumulative | ||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | since | ||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | inception | ||||||||||
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information |
||||||||||||
Cash paid during the year for |
||||||||||||
Interest |
$ | 93,688 | $ | | $ | 109,573 | ||||||
Income taxes |
$ | 800 | $ | 1,976 | $ | 5,969 | ||||||
Non-cash investing and financing activities |
||||||||||||
Acquisition of intangible asset through advance
from
related party and issuance of common stock |
$ | | $ | | $ | 505,000 | ||||||
Deferred compensation for stock options issued for
services |
| | 3,202,931 | |||||||||
Purchase of property and equipment financed by
advance from related party |
| | 3,550 | |||||||||
Conversion of related party debt to equity |
| | 515,000 | |||||||||
Issuance of common stock in settlement of payable |
| | 113,981 | |||||||||
Finders fees accrued for issuance of common stock |
| 95,280 | 113,492 | |||||||||
Value of warrants and beneficial conversion
feature of
convertible notes |
865,500 | | 2,318,683 | |||||||||
Cancellation of stock |
| | 8,047 | |||||||||
Conversion of accounts payable and accrued
expenses to common stock issued |
612,521 | | 612,521 | |||||||||
Conversion of related party debt to convertible
debentures |
45,000 | | 45,000 | |||||||||
Conversion of convertible debentures to common
stock |
1,452,319 | | 206,720 | |||||||||
Write off of deferred compensation |
142,187 | | 142,187 |
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
12
Table of Contents
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
1. | Organization and basis of presentation |
Basis of presentation
The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited, but in
the opinion of management of Save the World Air, Inc. (the Company), contain all
adjustments, which include normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the
financial position at June 30, 2006, the results of operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, and cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2006
and 2005. The balance sheet as of December 31, 2005 is derived from the Companys audited
financial statements.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements
that have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have
been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission, although management of the Company believes that the disclosures
contained in these financial statements are adequate to make the information presented
therein not misleading. For further information, refer to the financial statements and the
notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the
date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expense during
the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The results of
operations for the six months ended June 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the
results of operations to be expected for the full fiscal year ending December 31, 2006.
13
Table of Contents
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
1. | Organization and basis of presentation Continued |
Description of business
Save the World Air, Inc. (the Company) was incorporated in Nevada on February 18, 1998
under the name Mandalay Capital Corp. The Company changed its name to Save the World Air,
Inc. on February 11, 1999 following the purchase of the worldwide exclusive manufacturing,
marketing and distribution rights for the ZEFS device. The ZEFS is a device, which is
fitted to an internal combustion engine and is expected to reduce carbon monoxide
hydrocarbons and nitrous oxide emissions. During the past three years, the Company has
been acquiring new technologies, developing prototype products using the Companys
technologies and conducting scientific tests regarding the technologies and prototype
products. In 2003, the Company acquired worldwide intellectual property and patent rights
to technologies which reduce carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons and nitrous oxide emissions in
two- and four-stroke motorcycles, fuel-injection engines, generators and small engines.
The Company has also developed prototype products and named them CAT-MATE.
Consolidation policy
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of Save the World Air, Inc. and
Subsidiary include the accounts of Save the World Air, Inc. (the Parent) and its wholly
owned subsidiary STWA Asia Pte. Limited, incorporated on January 17, 2006. To date STWA
Asia Pte. Limited has had no operating activity. Currently the subsidiary holds $5,000 in
cash. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
Development stage enterprise
The Company is a development stage enterprise as defined by Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 7, Accounting and Reporting by Development Stage
Enterprises. All losses accumulated since the inception of the Company have been
considered as part of the Companys development stage activities.
The Companys focus is on research and development of proprietary devices that are
designed to reduce harmful emissions, and improve fuel efficiency and engine performance
on equipment and vehicles driven by internal combustion engines and has not yet generated
any revenues. The prototype devices are called ZEFS and CAT-MATE. The Company has put
forth efforts to complete the design, the development of production models and the
promotion of products in the market place worldwide. Expenses have been funded through
the sale of company stock, debt and the exercise of warrants. The Company has taken
actions to secure the intellectual property rights to the ZEFS and CAT-MATE devices. In
addition, the Company has initiated marketing efforts to international governmental
entities in cooperation with the United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) and various
original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), to eventually sell or license the ZEFS and
CAT-MATE products and technology.
14
Table of Contents
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
1. | Organization and basis of presentation Continued |
Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market and consist of
raw materials, work-in-progress, and finished goods.
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Certain significant estimates were made in connection with
preparing the Companys financial statements. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications of 2005 amounts have been made to conform with the 2006
presentation.
2. | Net loss per share |
Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to
common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the
period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution, using the treasury
stock method, that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were
exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that
then shared in the earnings of the Company. In computing diluted earnings per share, the
treasury stock method assumes that outstanding options and warrants are exercised and the
proceeds are used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period.
Options and warrants will have a dilutive effect under the treasury stock method only when
the average market price of the common stock during the period exceeds the exercise price
of the options and warrants. For the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, the
dilutive impact of outstanding stock options of 7,181,257 and 14,422,652 respectively, and
outstanding warrants of 22,050,058 and 16,433,914 have been excluded because their impact
on the loss per share is antidilutive.
15
Table of Contents
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
3. | Recent accounting pronouncements |
Statement No. 123(R)
On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statements of Financial Accounting Standards No.
123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, (SFAS 123(R)) which requires the measurement
and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to
employees and directors based on estimated fair values. SFAS 123(R) supersedes the
Companys previous accounting under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25) for periods beginning in fiscal
2006. In March 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 107 (SAB 107) relating to SFAS 123(R). The Company has applied the
provisions of SAB 107 in its adoption of SFAS 123(R).
The Company adopted SFAS 123(R) using the modified prospective transition method, which
requires the application of the accounting standard as of January 1, 2006, the first day
of the Companys fiscal year 2006. The Companys financial statements as of and for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2006 reflect the impact of SFAS 123(R). In accordance
with the modified prospective transition method, the Companys financial statements for
prior periods have not been restated to reflect, and do not include, the impact of SFAS
123(R). There was no stock-based compensation expense related to employee or director
stock options recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2005. Stock-based
compensation expense recognized under SFAS 123(R) for employee and directors for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2006 was $736,285 and $1,214,775, respectively. Basic and
diluted loss per share for the three months ended June 30, 2006 would have been $0.07 per
share, if the Company had not adopted SFAS 123(R), compared to reported basic and diluted
loss per share of $0.09 per share. Basic and diluted loss per share for the six months
ended June 30, 2006 would have been $0.15 per share, if the Company had not adopted SFAS
123(R), compared to reported basic and diluted loss per share of $0.18 per share.
The following table illustrates the effect on net loss and loss per share if the Company
had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 to stock-based awards
granted under the Companys stock option plans for the three and six months ended June 30,
2005. For purposes of this pro-forma disclosure, the fair value of the options is
estimated using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing formula (Black-Scholes model)
and amortized to expense over the options requisite service periods (vesting periods).
16
Table of Contents
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
3. | Recent accounting pronouncements Continued |
Statement No. 123(R) Continued
Three months | Six months | |||||||
ended | ended | |||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||
2005 | 2005 | |||||||
Net loss as reported |
$ | (774,517 | ) | $ | (1,839,573 | ) | ||
Add: total fair value method
stock-based employee based
compensation expense |
| (323,705 | ) | |||||
Less: deferred compensation
amortization for below market
employee options |
| 76,068 | ||||||
Pro forma net loss |
$ | (774,517 | ) | $ | (2,087,210 | ) | ||
Net loss per share: |
||||||||
As reported basic and diluted |
$ | (0.02 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | ||
Pro forma basic and diluted |
$ | (0.02 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | ||
SFAS 123(R) requires companies to estimate the fair value of share-based payment awards to
employees and directors on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. The value of
the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense over
the requisite service periods in the Companys Statements of Operations. Stock-based
compensation expense recognized in the Statements of Operations for the second quarter of
fiscal 2006 included compensation expense for share-based payment awards granted prior to,
but not yet vested as of January 1, 2006 based on the grant date fair value estimated in
accordance with the pro-forma provisions of SFAS 123 and compensation expense for the
share-based payment awards granted subsequent to January 1, 2006 based on the grant date
fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123(R). For stock-based
awards issued to employees and directors, stock-based compensation is attributed to
expense using the straight-line single option method, which is consistent with how the
prior-period pro formas were provided. As stock-based compensation expense recognized in
the Statements of Operations for the second quarter of fiscal 2006 is based on awards
ultimately expected to vest, it has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. SFAS 123(R)
requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in
subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. In our pro-forma
information required under SFAS 123 for the periods prior to fiscal 2006, the Company
accounted for forfeitures as they occurred.
17
Table of Contents
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
3. | Recent accounting pronouncements Continued |
Statement No. 123(R) Continued
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), the Company accounted for stock-based awards to
employees and directors using the intrinsic value method in accordance with APB 25. Under
the intrinsic value method, the Company recognized share-based compensation equal to the
awards intrinsic value at the time of grant over the requisite service periods using the
straight-line method. Forfeitures were recognized as incurred.
The Companys determination of fair value of share-based payment awards to employees and
directors on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model, which is affected by the
Companys stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and
subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to our expected stock
price volatility over the term of the awards, and actual and projected employee stock
option exercise behaviors.
The Company has elected to adopt the detailed method provided in SFAS 123(R) for
calculating the beginning balance of the additional paid-in capital pool (APIC pool)
related to the tax effects of employee stock-based compensation, and to determine the
subsequent impact on the APIC pool and Statements of Cash Flows of the tax effects of
employee stock-based compensation awards that are outstanding upon adoption of SFAS
123(R).
As of December 31, 2005, there was $142,187 of total unrecognized compensation costs
related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the 2004 Stock
Option Plan (see Note 7). This cost was written off against Additional Paid-in Capital
when SFAS 123(R) was adopted.
The Company accounts for stock option and warrant grants issued to non-employees for goods
and services using the guidance of SFAS No. 123 and Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
No. 96-18: Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other Than Employees for
Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services, whereby the fair value of
such option and warrant grants is determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model
at the earlier of the date at which the non-employees performance is completed or a
performance commitment is reached.
18
Table of Contents
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
3. | Recent accounting pronouncements Continued |
Statement No. 154
In May 2005, the FASB issued Statement No. 154 (SFAS 154) Accounting Changes and Error
Corrections a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3. SFAS 154
changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting
principle. APB Opinion 20 previously required that most voluntary changes in accounting
principle be recognized by including in net income of the period of the change the
cumulative effect of changing to the new accounting principle. SFAS 154 requires
retrospective application to prior periods financial statements of changes in accounting
principle, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects of
the cumulative effect of the change. In the event of such impracticality, SFAS 154
provides for other means of application. In the event the Company changes accounting
principles, it will evaluate the impact of SFAS 154.
4. | Inventories |
At June 30, 2006 inventories consist of $3,719 of finished goods.
5. | Certain relationships and related transactions |
Advances from founding executive officer
All of the marketing and manufacturing rights for the ZEFS were acquired from founding
officer Jeffery A. Muller, for 5,000,000 shares of common stock, $500,000 and a $10
royalty for each unit sold (see discussion below), pursuant to the Agreement entered into
in December 1998, by and between the Company and Mr. Muller. Working capital advances in
the amount of $517,208 and payment in the amount of $500,000 for marketing and
distribution rights of the ZEFS are due to Mr. Muller. Such amounts are interest free and
do not have any due dates for payment.
In January 2000, the Company entered into an agreement offering Mr. Muller and Lynne
Muller, Mr. Mullers wife, the option to purchase 5,000,000 shares each at $0.10 per share
as consideration for work performed for the Company. Mrs. Muller subsequently transferred
her option to Mr. Muller.
In connection with the Companys legal proceedings against Mr. Muller (see Note 11). The
Company has canceled (i) the 8,047,403 shares of its common stock held by Mr. Muller
and/or his affiliates, (ii) the options to acquire an additional 10,000,000 shares of the
Companys common stock held by Mr. Muller personally and (iii) the $1,017,208 of debt
which Mr. Muller claimed was owed to him by the Company.
19
Table of Contents
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
5. | Certain relationships and related transactions Continued |
Loans from related parties
Masry & Vititoe, a law firm in which Edward Masry, the Companys former Chief Executive
Officer, was a partner, had advanced $0 and $158,732 as of June 30, 2006 and December 31,
2005, respectively, to the Company for working capital purposes. Advances by Masry and
Vititoe were unsecured, non-interest bearing, were due on demand, and were repaid as of
June 30, 2006.
In 2005, Eugene Eichler, the Companys Chief Executive Officer, advanced $45,000 to the
Company for working capital purposes. These advances were unsecured, bearing interest at
6% per annum and were due on demand. In February 2006, these advances were converted into
a convertible note (Note 6).
Interest expense recognized under related-party loans was immaterial for all periods
presented Interest expense recognized under related-party loans for the period from
inception (February 18, 1998) through June 30, 2006 was $327.
Lease agreement
During 2003, the Company had entered into a sublease lease agreement with an entity to
lease office space for its primary administrative facility. A director of the Company is
an indirect owner of the entity.
In August 2005, the Company amended its sublease of a portion of a building in North
Hollywood, California from an entity that is owned by a director of the Company. The lease
term was from November 1, 2003 through October 16, 2005 and carried an option to renew for
two additional years with a 10 percent increase in the rental rate. Monthly rent under
this lease is $3,740 per month under this lease as amended as of December 31, 2005. The
Company exercised its option to renew the lease through October 15, 2007.
In January 2006, the Company amended the existing sublease agreement. The sublease was
amended to July 31, 2007 and carries an option to renew for two additional years with a 10
percent increase in the rental rate. Monthly rent is $6,208 per month under this amended
sublease.
During the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, rent expense under the sublease was
$18,624 and $10,200, respectively
During the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, rent expense under the sublease was
$37,248 and $13,600, respectively. Lease expense under the sublease prior to 2004 was
immaterial.
6. | Convertible debentures |
During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company completed the first part of a private
offering of its 9% Convertible Notes due at dates ranging between May 31, 2006 and July 31,
2006 (the Notes) and Warrants to purchase shares of the Companys common stock which
expire between August 31, 2007 and December 28, 2007 (the Warrants). The Notes are
20
Table of Contents
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
convertible at $0.70 per share of common stock and the Warrants entitle the holder to
purchase a number of shares of the Companys common stock equal
to 150% of the number of shares of common stock into which the Note is convertible. The Warrants are exercisable at a
price of $1.00 per share.
During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company issued Notes totaling $1,576,378 and
paid related transaction fees of $123,196, resulting in net proceeds to the Company of
$1,453,182. In addition to the cash paid for transaction fees, 166,126 additional Warrants
were issued to certain placement agents. These Warrants expire between August 31, 2007 and
December 28, 2007 and are exercisable at a price of $1.00 per share.
The aggregate value of the Warrants issued in connection with the offering and to the finder
were valued at $696,413 using the Black-Scholes option valuation model with the following
assumptions; risk-free interest rate of 4.02% to 4.45%; dividend yield of 0%; volatility
factors of the expected market price of common stock of 83.59%; and an expected life of two
years (statutory term). The company also determined that the notes contained a beneficial
conversion feature of $756,768.
The value of the Warrants of $696,413, the conversion option of $756,768, and the
transaction fees of $123,196 are considered as debt discount and are being amortized over
the life of the Notes. During 2005, $318,759 of such discount has been amortized and
included in the accompanying statements of operations. The remaining unamortized debit
discount as of December 31, 2005 of $1,257,619 has been netted against the convertible
debentures in the accompanying balance sheet.
During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company issued additional Notes totaling
$1,000,000 which included the conversion of $45,000 of debt owed to the Companys Chief
Financial Officer. The Company paid related transaction fees of $89,500 resulting in net
proceeds to the Company of $865,500. In addition to the cash paid for transaction fees,
117,857 additional Warrants were issued to certain placement agents. These Warrants expire
between August 31, 2007 and February 9, 2008 and are exercisable at a price of $1.00 per
share.
21
Table of Contents
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
6. | Convertible debentures Continued |
The aggregate value of the Warrants issued in connection with the offering and to the finder
were valued at $620,252 using the Black-Scholes option valuation model with the following
assumptions; risk-free interest rate of 4.35% to 4.66%; dividend yield of 0%; volatility
factors of the expected market price of common stock of 130.61%; and an expected life of two
years (statutory term). The company also determined that the notes contained a beneficial
conversion feature of $290,248.
The value of the Warrants of $620,252, the conversion option of $290,248, and the
transaction fees of $89,500 are considered as debt discount and are being amortized over the
life of the Notes.
For the six months ended June 30, 2006, $2,113,825 of the total discount has been amortized
and included in the accompanying statement of operations. The remaining unamortized debt
discount of $143,795 has been netted against the $1,127,658 Convertible Notes in the
accompanying June 30, 2006 Balance Sheet.
During the three months ended June 30, 2006, $1,242,000 of the Notes were converted to
1,774,286 shares of stock at $0.70 per share. In addition, $3,595 of accrued interest was
converted to 5,136 shares at $0.70 per share.
During the six months ended June 30, 2006, $1,448,720 of the Notes were converted to
2,069,600 shares of stock at $0.70 per share. In addition, $3,595 of accrued interest was
converted to 5,136 shares at $0.70 per share.
7. | Capital stock |
As of June 30, 2006, the Company has authorized 200,000,000 shares of its common stock, of
which 37,360,368 shares were issued and outstanding.
During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company issued 1,599,500 units of common
stock, which consisted of one share of common stock and one warrant to acquire a share of
common stock at an exercise price of $1.50 per share, for net proceeds of $1,490,660. The
1,599,500 warrants were issued to investors as part of an equity agreement and were not
ascribed any value in the accompanying financial statements. Of the 1,599,500 shares
issued, the Company issued 69,000 shares of common stock for which payment was previously
received. The Company also issued 50,500 shares for the exercise of warrants, 50,000 of
which payment was previously received.
22
Table of Contents
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
7. | Capital stock Continued |
The warrants issued above were part of a private offering of 2,892,000 units that began
July 29, 2004 and concluded on July 22, 2005. The expiration date of each of the warrants
was previously extended by one hundred eighty (180) days from its original expiration
date. On February 6, 2006, the Company extended the expiration date for each of the
warrants by an additional one hundred eighty-five (185) days, for a total extension of one
year from its original expiration date.
During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company agreed to issue 846,548 shares in
settlement of accrued expenses of $612,521. These shares were reflected as common stock
to be issued in the accompanying December 31, 2005 financial statements, and were
subsequently issued in 2006.
In April 2006, the Company sold an aggregate 473,000 shares of common stock and warrants
to purchase 118,250 additional shares of common stock at $2.60 per share, to two investors
who are not U.S. persons as that term is defined in Rule 902 of Regulation S promulgated
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Gross proceeds to the Company in connection
with these issuances were $737,881 and net proceeds were $667,803.
In May 2006, the Company sold an aggregate 873,018 shares of common stock and warrants to
purchase 436,511 additional shares of common stock at $2.70 per share, for an aggregate
$1,650,009 gross proceeds ($1,435,508 net proceeds). In addition, warrants exercisable
for 87,302 shares of the Companys common stock were issued to the Companys placement
agent.
During the six months ended June 30, 2006, individuals exercised outstanding warrants to
purchase 1,745,250 shares of common stock for net proceeds of $1,117,625.
8. | Stock options and warrants |
The Company currently issues stock options to employees, directors and consultants under the
2004 Stock Plan (the Plan). As of December 31, 2005, the Company could issue options under
the Plan to acquire up to 5,000,000 shares of common stock. In February 2006, the board
approved an amendment to the Plan, increasing the authorized shares by 2,000,000 shares to
7,000,000 shares. At June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, 3,068,743 and 1,741,439,
respectively, were available to be granted under the Plan. Prior to 2004, the Company
granted outside the Plan 3,250,000 options to officers of the Company that are still
outstanding.
23
Table of Contents
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
8. | Stock options and warrants Continued |
Employee options vest according to the terms of the specific grant and expire from 5 to 10
years from date of grant. Non-employee option grants to date are vested upon issuance. The
weighted-average, remaining contractual life of employee options outstanding at June 30,
2006 and December 31, 2005 was 5.60 years and 5.26 years, respectively. Stock option
activity for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and the year ended December 31, 2005 was as
follows, which includes 3,250,000 options granted outside the Plan:
Weighted Avg. | Weighted Avg. | |||||||
Options | Exercise Price | |||||||
Options, January 1, 2004 |
13,250,000 | 0.11 | ||||||
Options granted |
1,172,652 | 1.03 | ||||||
Options exercised |
| | ||||||
Options cancelled |
| | ||||||
Options, December 31, 2004 |
14,422,652 | 0.18 | ||||||
Options granted |
2,085,909 | 0.92 | ||||||
Options exercised |
| | ||||||
Options cancelled |
(10,000,000 | ) | 0.10 | |||||
Options, December 31, 2005 |
6,508,561 | 0.53 | ||||||
Options granted (unaudited) |
1,163,605 | 1.08 | ||||||
Options exercised (unaudited) |
| | ||||||
Options forfeited (unaudited) |
(490,909 | ) | 0.90 | |||||
Options cancelled (unaudited) |
| | ||||||
Options, June 30, 2006 (unaudited) |
7,181,257 | $ | 0.59 | |||||
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company granted no options and
1,163,605 options, respectively to certain employees, exercisable at amounts ranging from
$0.85 to $1.69, vested over one year with a ten year life. The options were valued at an
aggregate amount of $1,809,518 (or $1.555 per share on average) using the Black Scholes
pricing model using a 5.5 year expected term, 130.61% volatility, no annual dividends, and a
discount rate of 4.59%.
24
Table of Contents
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
8. | Stock options and warrants Continued |
Options outstanding at December 31, 2005 and the related weighted-average exercise price
and remaining life information were as follows:
Total | Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | weighted | weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||||
average | average | average | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise | Total options | remaining | exercise | Options | exercise | |||||||||||||||||||
prices | outstanding | life in years | price | exercisable | price | |||||||||||||||||||
$ | 0.10 | 3,000,000 | 3.84 | $ | 0.10 | 3,000,000 | $ | 0.10 | ||||||||||||||||
0.40 | 250,000 | 3.17 | 0.40 | 250,000 | 0.40 | |||||||||||||||||||
0.85 | 400,000 | 4.58 | 0.85 | | | |||||||||||||||||||
0.85 | 1,225,000 | 9.58 | 0.85 | | | |||||||||||||||||||
0.98 | 900,000 | 3.17 | 0.98 | 900,000 | 0.98 | |||||||||||||||||||
1.00 | 370,000 | 9.58 | 1.00 | | | |||||||||||||||||||
1.10 | 90,909 | 4.58 | 1.10 | | | |||||||||||||||||||
1.15 | 193,912 | 3.17 | 1.15 | 193,912 | 1.15 | |||||||||||||||||||
1.27 | 78,740 | 3.17 | 1.27 | 78,740 | 1.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
6,508,561 | 5.26 | $ | 0.53 | 4,422,652 | $ | 0.36 | ||||||||||||||||||
The weighted average exercise prices, remaining contractual lives and aggregate intrinsic
values for options granted, exercisable, and expected to vest under the Plan as of
December 31, 2005 were as follows:
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Average | |||||||||||||||
Number | Average | Remaining | ||||||||||||||
of | Exercise | Contractual | Intrinsic | |||||||||||||
shares | Price | Life (Years) | Value | |||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2005: |
||||||||||||||||
Outstanding |
6,508,561 | $ | 0.53 | 5.26 | $ | 2,600,000 | ||||||||||
Expected to Vest |
6,017,652 | $ | 0.43 | 5.31 | $ | 2,600,000 | ||||||||||
Exercisable |
4,422,652 | $ | 0.52 | 3.62 | $ | 2,600,000 |
Aggregate intrinsic value excludes those options that are not-in-the-money as of
December 31, 2005. Awards that are expected to vest take into consideration estimated
forfeitures for awards not yet vested.
25
Table of Contents
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
8. | Stock options and warrants Continued |
Options outstanding at June 30, 2006 and the related weighted average exercise price and
remaining life information is as follows: (Unaudited)
Total | Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | weighted | weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||||
average | average | average | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise | Total options | remaining | exercise | Options | exercise | |||||||||||||||||||
prices | outstanding | life in years | price | exercisable | price | |||||||||||||||||||
$ | 0.10 | 3,000,000 | 3.35 | $ | 0.10 | 3,000,000 | $ | 0.10 | ||||||||||||||||
0.40 | 250,000 | 2.67 | 0.40 | 250,000 | 0.40 | |||||||||||||||||||
0.85 | 1,225,000 | 9.08 | 0.85 | | | |||||||||||||||||||
0.85 | 850,000 | 9.65 | 0.85 | |||||||||||||||||||||
0.98 | 900,000 | 2.67 | 0.98 | 900,000 | 0.98 | |||||||||||||||||||
1.00 | 370,000 | 9.08 | 1.00 | | | |||||||||||||||||||
1.15 | 193,912 | 2.67 | 1.15 | 193,912 | 1.15 | |||||||||||||||||||
1.27 | 78,740 | 2.67 | 1.27 | 78,740 | 1.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
1.69 | 313,605 | 9.65 | 1.69 | | | |||||||||||||||||||
7,181,257 | 5.60 | $ | 0.59 | 4,422,652 | $ | 0.36 | ||||||||||||||||||
Intrinsic value of employee options
During 2004 and prior, certain employee options were granted with exercise prices less the
than fair market value of the Companys stock at the date of grant. As the grants were to
employees, the intrinsic value method, as allowed under APB No. 25, was used to calculate
the related compensation expense. For the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company granted
1,172,652 options to certain employees, exercisable at amounts ranging from $0.98 to $1.27,
vested over one year with a ten-year life, except for 78,740 options issued to an employee
who is a 10 percent beneficial owner of the Company. The life of these options is 5 years.
Options granted in 2004 were valued using the intrinsic method at $248,891.
During the year ended December 31, 2005, certain employee options were granted with exercise
prices less the than fair market value of the Companys stock at the date of grant. As the
grants were to employees, the intrinsic value method was used to calculate the related
compensation expense. For the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company granted 2,085,909
options to certain employees, exercisable at amounts ranging from $0.85 to $1.10, vested
over one year with a ten-year life, except for 90,909 options issued to an employee who is a
10 percent beneficial owner of the Company. The life of these options is 5 years. Options
granted in 2005 were valued using the intrinsic method at $243,750.
8. | Stock options and warrants Continued | |
Intrinsic value of employee options Continued |
26
Table of Contents
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
During the six months ended June 30, 2005, and during the year ended December 31, 2005, the
Company recognized compensation expense by amortizing deferred compensation of $76,068, and
$163,786, respectively.
Black-Scholes value of employee options
During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company valued employee options for pro-forma
purposes at the grant date using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following
average assumptions:
Expected life (years) |
5.26 | |||
Risk free interest rate |
4.02 | % | ||
Volatility |
188.83 | % | ||
Expected dividend yield |
0.00 | % |
The weighted average fair value for options granted in 2005 was $0.69.
27
Table of Contents
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
8. | Stock options and warrants Continued |
Warrants
The following table summarizes certain information about the Companys stock purchase
warrants.
Weighted Avg. | ||||||||
Warrants | Exercise Price | |||||||
Warrants outstanding, January 1, 2004 |
14,117,414 | $ | 0.48 | |||||
Warrants granted |
2,372,500 | 1.27 | ||||||
Warrants exercised |
(960,500 | ) | 0.20 | |||||
Warrants cancelled |
| | ||||||
Warrants outstanding, December 31, 2004 |
15,529,414 | 0.62 | ||||||
Warrants granted |
5,198,578 | 1.16 | ||||||
Warrants exercised |
(50,500 | ) | 0.59 | |||||
Warrants cancelled |
(20,000 | ) | 1.50 | |||||
Warrants outstanding, December 31, 2005 |
20,657,492 | 0.75 | ||||||
Warrants granted (unaudited) |
3,264,600 | 1.33 | ||||||
Warrants exercised (unaudited) |
(1,745,250 | ) | 0.61 | |||||
Warrants cancelled (unaudited) |
(126,784 | ) | 1.00 | |||||
Warrants outstanding, June 30, 2006 (unaudited) |
22,050,058 | $ | 0.85 | |||||
During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company issued 10,000 warrants to an
individual for settlement of a claim. The Company also issued 25,000 warrants to an
individual in exchange for consulting services rendered. The warrants were valued at an
aggregate amount of $18,462 using the Black Scholes pricing model using 3-year and 5-year
respective terms (statutory terms), 58.69% volatility, no annual dividends, and a discount
rate of 3.55% and 4.13%, respectively.
During February 2006, the Company issued 250,000 performance based warrants to an outside
consultant. These warrants are to be exercisable at $.40 per share, are fully vested and
exercisable immediately. These warrants were valued at $401,130 using the Black-Scholes
option valuation model with the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 4.59%,
dividends yield of 0%, volatility factors of the expected market price common of 130.61%,
and an expected life of five years.
28
Table of Contents
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
8. | Stock options and warrants Continued |
Warrants Continued
In April 2006, the Company entered into a one-year agreement with an outside consultant to
provide public relations services. The terms of the agreement calls for monthly payments
of $7,000. Additionally, the Company issued a five-year warrant to the consultant. The
warrant is exercisable for up to 100,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of
$2.30 per share and vests as to 8,333 shares per month commencing April 30, 2006. The
shares issuable upon exercise of the warrant have piggyback registration rights.
9. | Research and development | |
The Company has research and development facilities in Morgan Hill, California and Queensland, Australia. The Company has expanded research and development to include application of the technologies utilized by the ZEFS and CAT-MATE device for diesel engines, motorbikes, boats, generators, lawnmowers and other small engines. The Company has purchased test vehicles, test engines and testing equipment. The Company has completed testing on ZEFS and CAT-MATE devices for multiple automobiles, trucks motorcycles, off-road vehicles and stationary engines, the results of which have been provided to RAND Corporation (RAND) for evaluation. RAND oversees the research and development facilities. The Company also uses third party research and development facilities in Los Angeles, California for the development of the ZEFS and CAT-MATE devices. The Company spent $121,111 and $190,637 for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Company spent $178,873 and $592,122 for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. | ||
10. | Going concern | |
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company had a net loss of $5,990,330 and a negative cash flow from operations of $2,454,893 for the six months ended June 30, 2006, and had a working capital deficiency of $526,961 and a stockholders deficiency of $155,189 at June 30, 2006. These factors raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Companys ability to raise additional funds and implement its business plan. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern. |
29
Table of Contents
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
11. | Commitments and contingencies (TO BE UPDATED BY LANCE/MATTHEWS) |
Legal matters
On December 19, 2001, the SEC filed civil charges in the United States Federal District
Court, Southern District of New York, against us, the Companys former President and then
sole director Jeffrey A. Muller, and others, alleging that the Company and the other
defendants were engaged in a fraudulent scheme to promote our stock. The SEC complaint
alleged the existence of a promotional campaign using press releases, Internet postings,
an elaborate website, and televised media events to disseminate false and materially
misleading information as part of a fraudulent scheme to manipulate the market for stock
in the corporation, which was then controlled by Mr. Muller. On March 22, 2002, the
Company signed a consent to final judgment of permanent injunction and other relief in
settlement of this action as against the corporation only, which the court approved on
July 2, 2002. Under this settlement, the Company was not required to admit fault and did
not pay any fines or restitution. The SECs charges of fraud and stock manipulation
continue against Mr. Muller and others.
On July 2, 2002, after an investigation by the Companys newly constituted board of
directors, the Company filed a cross-complaint in the SEC action against Mr. Muller and
others seeking injunctive relief, disgorgement of monies and stock and financial
restitution for a variety of acts and omissions in connection with sales of the Companys
stock and other transactions occurring between 1998 and 2002. Among other things, the
Company alleged that Mr. Muller and certain others sold company stock without providing
adequate consideration to the Company; sold insider shares without making proper
disclosures and failed to make necessary filings required under federal securities laws;
engaged in self-dealing and entered into various undisclosed related-party transactions;
misappropriated for their own use proceeds from sales of the Companys stock; and entered
into various undisclosed arrangements regarding the control, voting and disposition of
their stock. The Company contends that it is entitled to a judgment canceling all of the
approximately 8,716,710 shares of the Companys common stock that were previously obtained
and controlled, directly or indirectly, by Mr. Muller; divesting and preventing any
subsequent holders of the right to exercise options previously held by Mr. Muller for
10,000,000 shares of the Companys common stock, conversion of an existing preliminary
injunction to a permanent injunction to prevent Mr. Muller from any involvement with the
Company and a monetary judgment against Mr. Muller and others in the amount of several
million dollars.
30
Table of Contents
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
11. | Commitments and contingencies Continued |
Legal matters Continued
In the course of the litigation, the Company has obtained ownership control over Mr.
Mullers claimed patent rights to the ZEFS device. Under a Buy-Sell Agreement between Mr.
Muller and the Company dated December 29, 1998, Mr. Muller, who was listed on the ZEFS
devise patent application as the inventor of the ZEFS device, purported to grant us all
international marketing, manufacturing and distribution rights to the ZEFS device. Those
rights were disputed because an original inventor of the ZEFS device contested Mr.
Mullers legal ability to have conveyed those rights.
In Australia, Mr. Muller entered into a bankruptcy action seeking to overcome the
Companys claims for ownership of the ZEFS device. In conjunction with these litigation
proceedings, a settlement agreement was reached whereby the $10 per unit royalty
previously due to Mr. Muller under his contested Buy-Sell Agreement was terminated and
replaced with a $.20 per unit royalty payable to the bankruptcy trustee. On November 7,
2002, under a settlement agreement executed with the Mr. Mullers bankruptcy trustee, the
trustee transferred to the Company all ownership and legal rights to this international
patent application for the ZEFS device.
Both the SEC and the Company have filed Motions for Summary Judgment contending that there
are no material issues of fact in contention and as a matter of law, the Court should
grant a judgment against Mr. Muller and the cross-defendants. Mr. Muller has filed a
response contending the motions are without merit or substance.
Mr. Muller and several of the defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the complaint filed by
the Company and moved for summary judgment in their favor. On December 21, 2004, Judge
George B. Daniels denied the cross-defendants motion to dismiss the Companys
cross-complaint, denied the request to vacate the July 2, 2002 preliminary injunction and
denied the request for damages against the Company. The court also refused to grant a
summary judgment in favor of the cross-defendants and dismissed Mr. Mullers claims
against the Company for indemnification for his legal costs and for damages resulting from
the litigation. Neither Mr. Muller nor any of the cross-defendants have filed any
cross-claims against the Company and the Company is not exposed to any liability as a
result of the litigation, except for possibly incurring legal fees and expenses should the
Company lose the litigation.
31
Table of Contents
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
11. | Commitments and contingencies Continued | |
Legal matters Continued |
On November 16, 2005, the Court granted the SECs motion for summary judgment. In granting
the motion, the Court has barred Mr. Muller from serving as an officer or director of a
public company for a period of 20 years, ordered Mr. Muller to disgorge any shares of our
stock that he still owns and directed the Company to cancel any issued and outstanding shares of our stock still owned by Mr. Muller. Mr. Muller was also ordered to disgorge to
the SEC unlawful profits in the amount of $7.5 million and a pay a civil penalty in the
amount of $100,000. Acting in accordance with the Courts order, the Company has canceled
(i) 8,047,403 shares of its common stock held by Mr. Muller and/or his affiliates, (ii)
options to acquire an additional 10,000,000 shares of the Companys common stock held by
Mr. Muller personally and (iii) $1,017,208 of debt which Mr. Muller claimed was owed to
him by the Company.
In response to the November 16, 2005 decision by the Court, Muller filed a motion seeking
to set aside the decision and order of the Court. On March 31, 2006, the Court issued a
decision and order denying Mullers motion to set aside the decision on summary judgment
issued against Muller on November 16, 2005.
A final decision on the motion for summary judgment filed by the Company, which
potentially would terminate the ongoing litigation, is still pending. Should the Court not
grant summary judgment in favor of the Company, the case will be scheduled for final
disposition in a trial. Although the outcome of this litigation cannot be predicted with
any degree of certainty, the Company is optimistic that, based upon previous developments
in the litigation and the Courts granting of the SECs motion for summary judgment, the
Courts ruling on the motion for summary judgment will either significantly narrow the
issues for any later trial or will result in a final disposition of the case in a manner
favorable to the Company.
In April 2005, Jeffrey A. Muller, the Companys former sole director and executive
officer, filed a lawsuit in the Federal District Court for the Central District of
California, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief and alleging unfair competition in
connection with a claimed prior patent interest in the ZEFS device and stock option
rights. In seeking declaratory relief, Mr. Muller is seeking to have the patent rights in
the ZEFS device that were previously transferred to the Company by Mr. Mullers bankruptcy
trustee declared null and void.
32
Table of Contents
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)
11. | Commitments and contingencies Continued | |
Legal matters Continued |
This recent lawsuit brought by Mr. Muller arises out of the same claims that are the
subject of ongoing litigation in the Federal District Court for the Southern District of
New York, in which the Company has previously obtained a preliminary injunction against
Mr. Muller barring him from any involvement with the Company and preventing Mr. Muller,
his agents or assigns, from exercising any claimed rights to the Companys assets or
stock. Mr. Muller previously filed the same complaint in the Federal District Court for
the Southern District of New York, which claim is pending dismissal. On December 28,
2004, Federal District Court Judge George B. Daniels issued a decision dismissing motions
filed by Mr. Muller against the Companys cross-claims. The dismissal of those motions
involved similar causes of action as those contained in Mr. Mullers recent lawsuit
commenced in the Federal District Court for the Central District of California. Since the
case in New York is still pending, the filing of the new lawsuit in California is subject
to various defenses which should result in the dismissal of the new lawsuit.
On January 25, 2006, Mr. Mullers complaint, filed in the California District Court and
transferred to the Federal Court in the Southern District of New York, was assigned to
Judge George B. Daniels. It is expected that the Court will consolidate that complaint
with the already pending claims encompassed within the Companys Motion for Summary
Judgment. While the Company believes that it will have valid claims and defenses, there
can be no assurance that an adverse result or outcome on the pending motions or a trial of
this case would not have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial position or
cash flow.
12. | Subsequent events | |
Subsequent to June 30, 2006, $1,127,658 of the convertible notes plus $112 of interest were converted to 1,611,100 shares of stock at $0.70 per share. | ||
As of July 26, 2006, individuals exercised outstanding warrants, at $1.50 per share, to purchase an additional 150,000 shares for an aggregate $225,000 gross and net proceeds. | ||
In August 2006, the Company approved and authorized a grant to non-employee directors options to purchase 120,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.255 per share. The options vest in twelve months and expire in five years. The Company also approved and authorized a grant to a non-employee director an option to purchase 30,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.255 per share. The option vests immediately and expires in one year. |
33
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operations
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB contains forward-looking statements. These
forward-looking statements include predictions regarding our future:
| revenues and profits; | |
| customers; | |
| research and development expenses and efforts; | |
| scientific test results; | |
| sales and marketing expenses and efforts; | |
| liquidity and sufficiency of existing cash; | |
| pending and future financings; | |
| the success of new product development; | |
| market acceptance and commercial viability of our existing and new products; | |
| the outcome of pending or threatened litigation; and | |
| the effect of recent accounting pronouncements on our financial condition and results of operations. |
You can identify these and other forward-looking statements by the use of words such as may,
will, expects, anticipates, believes, estimates, continues, or the negative of such
terms, or other comparable terminology. Forward-looking statements also include the assumptions
underlying or relating to any of the foregoing statements.
Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking
statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth under the heading Risk
Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005. All
forward-looking statements included in this document are based on information available to us on
the date hereof. We assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements.
Overview
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations
should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and notes thereto included in Part I,
Item 1 of this Form 10-QSB and the Financial Statements and notes thereto contained in our Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.
We are a development stage company that has not yet generated revenues.
Historically, we devoted the bulk of our efforts to the completion of the design, the
development of our production models and the promotion of our products in the marketplace
worldwide. Our products, based on our ZEFS, CAT-MATE and MK IV technologies, are
designed to reduce harmful emissions, and improve fuel efficiency and overall performance on
equipment and vehicles driven by internal combustion engines. We have taken actions to
secure our intellectual property rights to the ZEFS and CAT-MATE technologies.
34
Table of Contents
During 2005 and continuing in the six-month period ended June 30, 2006, we began
to focus on the initial marketing of our products. We entered into the first agreements for
the distribution of our products in late 2005 and early 2006. Our first two U.S.
distributorship agreements with Team Phantom of Alaska and Motorcycle Products Consulting
(MPC) of California, provides for the sale of our ZEFS and MK IV-based products in the
North American original equipment manufacturer (OEM) and after-market for motorcycles
through the distributors to certain named prospective purchasers.
In January 2006, we entered into our first international distributorship agreement,
with Golden Allied Enterprises (Group) Co., Ltd. (GAE). The agreement provides that GAE
will serve as our exclusive distributor for our products using ZEFS, CAT-MATE and MK IV
technologies in the Peoples Republic of China. The agreement with GAE was conditioned
upon our ZEFS-based products achieving EURO2 standards in tests to be conducted in
Shanghai. These tests were conducted and passed in April 2006.
In July 2006, GAE placed its first order under the distributorship agreement, for 100,000
units, to be shipped in installments between now and July 2007. These product are in
pre-production and we anticipate that we will begin delivering products under the agreement to GAE
commencing in September 2006, and will begin generating revenue in late 2006.
In April 2006, we entered into a product development agreement with Kwong Kee (Qing Xin)
Environmental Exhaust Systems Company, Ltd. in China. Kwong Kee, a manufacturer of mufflers and
catalytic converters, will collaborate with us on product development based on our CAT-MATE
technology. As part of our strategic alliance, Kwong Kee will make available its research and
development facilities, testing equipment and product design and development support team.
In July 2006, we entered into an agreement with Quadrant Technology L.P. pursuant
to which Quadrant Technology will provide product development services for our products. Under
this agreement, Quadrant Technology was also granted a right of first refusal to manufacture our
ZEFS and other magnetic products.
Also in July 2006, we entered into an agreement with Marketing Matters, Inc. to provide
exclusive agency services in the United States for advertising, marketing, industry and trade show
promotion, as well as packagin desing services. We entered into a separate agreement with SS Sales
and Marketing Group, to provide marketing and promotional services in the western United States and
western Canada for our products.
In addition, we are continuing our marketing efforts to international governmental entities in
cooperation with the United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) and various OEMs and the
aftermarket to sell or license products using our ZEFS and CAT-MATE technologies. We anticipate
that these efforts will continue during the remainder of 2006.
As part of our ongoing product development, we are in the process of launching two new
product lines, ECO ChargR and MAG ChargR, which we differentiate products based on their differing
magnetic fluxes and their applications. ECO ChargR products will be more focused toward reduction
in emissions and MAG ChargR will be more focused toward performance and fuel economy.
The ECO ChargR product line employs our ZEFS and MK IV technologies, and is intended
specifically for the reduction of exhaust emissions in vehicle and small utility motors. These
products will be marketed primarily to OEMs as well as pilot and government-mandated emissions
programs.
The MAG ChargR products feature our ZEFS or MK IV technologies, as well as other power
enhancing features, to exploit the power and mileage improving attributes of our magnetic
technologies. MAG ChargR will be marketed primarily to the consumer aftermarket for many vehicles,
including but not limited to cars, trucks, motorcycles, scooters, all terrain vehicles (ATVs),
snowmobiles, personal watercrafts and small utility motors.
35
Table of Contents
Expenses have been funded primarily through the sale of stock and convertible debt. We have
raised capital in 2006 and will need to raise additional capital in 2006, and possibly beyond, to
fund our sales and marketing efforts, continuing research and development, and certain other
expenses, until our revenue base grows sufficiently.
Since February 2, 2006, our common stock has been quoted on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin
Board under the symbol ZERO.
Results of Operations
To date, we have not generated any revenues and our business continues in the development
stage. We have focused our efforts on verifying and developing our technologies and products and
commencing marketing efforts for their sale. We expect to begin generating revenue in late 2006.
General and administrative expenses were $1,852,870 for the three-month period ended June 30,
2006, compared to $583,310 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2005, an increase of
$1,269,560. This increase is primarily attributable to in non-cash items in the amount of $761,620.
These non-cash items are made up of revaluation of options and warrants using the Black- Scholes
option pricing model amounting to $729,983, and depreciation of $31,637. Increases in cash expenses
were $507,940 and were made up of salaries, benefits and consulting fees of $193,168; corporate
expenses of $38,226; professional fees of $133,866; travel of $87,668 and rent and utilities and
office expenses of $55,012.
General and administrative expenses were $3,607,840 for the six-month period
ended June 30, 2006, compared to $1,244,905 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2005, an
increase of $2,362,935. This increase is primarily attributable to in non-cash items in the amount
of $1,586,215. These non-cash items are made up of revaluation of options and warrants using the
Black- Scholes option pricing model amounting to $1,533,634, and depreciation of $52,681. Increases
in cash expenses were $776,720 and were made up of salaries, benefits and consulting fees of
$370,840; corporate expenses of $56,092; professional fees of $184,116; travel expense of $57,370
and rent and utilities and office expenses of $108,302.
Research and development expenses were $121,111 for the three-month period ended June 30,
2006, compared to $190,637 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2005, a decrease of $69,526.
This decrease is primarily attributable to a decrease in research by RAND Corporation of $80,691,
offset in part by an increase in product research, testing and prototype expenses of $11,165.
Research and development expenses were $178,873 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2006,
compared to $592,122 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2005, a decrease of $413,249. This
decrease is primarily attributable to a decrease in research by RAND Corporation of $460,723,
offset in part by an increase in product research, testing and prototype expenses of $47,474.
Other
Other Income (expense) was ($1,018,244) for the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to
($570) for the three months ended June 30, 2005, an increase of $1,017,674. This increase is
primarily attributed to an increase in non-cash interest expense made up of an accounting valuation
and amortization of warrant values associated with convertible debt financing totaling $974,889 and
actual interest paid of $44,886. Interest and other income increased $7,101.
Other income (expense) was ($2,203,617) for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to
($2,546) for the six months ended June 30, 2005, an increase of $2,201,071. This increase is
primarily attributed to an increase in non-cash interest expense made up of accounting valuation
and amortization of warrant values associated with convertible debt financing totaling $2,113,825
and actual interest paid of $95,523. Interest and other income increased $7,101 and provision for
income taxes decreased $1,176.
36
Table of Contents
We expect our operating costs to increase during the balance of fiscal year 2006, primarily as
a result of anticipated increases in product development expenses, general and administrative
expenses and marketing expenses, as we continue production and sales activities during 2006.
We had a net loss of $2,992,225, or $0.09 per share, for the three-month period ended June 30,
2006, compared to a net loss of $774,517, or $0.02 per share for the three-month period ended June
30, 2005. We had a net loss of $5,990,330, or $0.18 per share, for the six-month period ended June
30, 2006, compared to a net loss of $1,839,573, or $0.05 per share for the six-month period ended
June 30, 2005. We expect to incur additional net loss in the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006,
primarily attributable to continued general and administrative expenses and marketing-related
expenditures without the benefit of any significant revenue for the remainder of the year.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We have incurred negative cash flow from operations in the development stage since our
inception in 1998. As of June 30, 2006, we had cash of $1,628,517 and an accumulated deficit of
$26,236,404. Our negative operating cash flow since inception has been funded primarily through the
sale of common stock, issuance of convertible debt, and, to a lesser degree, by proceeds we
received from the exercise of options and warrants.
The financial statements accompanying this Report have been prepared on a going concern basis,
which contemplates the realization of assets and settlement of liabilities and commitments in the
normal course of our business. As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, we had a net
loss of $2,992,225 and negative cash flow from operations of $1,513,930 for the three-month period
ended June 30, 2006, a net loss of $5,990,330 and negative cash flow from operations of $2,449,893
for the six-month period ended June 30, 2006 and a stockholders deficiency of $155,189 as of June
30, 2006. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on our ability to raise additional funds
and implement our business plan. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
be necessary if we are unable to continue as a going concern.
As of June 30, 2006, our expenses ran, and are expected to continue to run, at
a burn rate of approximately $400,000 per month. Our current capital resources will be sufficient
to fund operations only through October 2006, and we will require additional capital in order to
operate beyond this date. We anticipate that at least a portion of our cash flow needs will be
satisfied by the exercise of outstanding warrants to purchase our common stock, at variable prices,
which are coming due at various times this year. In addition, we are actively pursuing other
financing alternatives, none of which is in place at present.
In 2005, we sold an aggregate of $1,501,378 principal amount of our 9% convertible
subordinated notes (the Investor Notes) due July 31, 2006, to certain investors. Subsequent to
the end of the three-month period ended June 30, 2006 and prior to the maturity date of the
Investor Notes, $1,127,658 aggregate principal amount of Investor Notes (representing 100% of the
outstanding principal amount of the then-outstanding notes) and $112 of accrued interest, were
converted voluntarily by the holders of the Investor Notes into 1,611,100 shares of our common
stock, at a conversion price of $0.70 per share.
In late 2005 and early 2006, we conducted an offering (the Bridge Offering) and sold an
aggregate $1,075,000 principal amount of our 9% convertible subordinated notes (the Bridge Notes)
and issued warrants (Bridge Warrants) to purchase up to 2,303,568 shares of our common stock at
$1.00 per share, to certain investors. Net proceeds to us from the sale of the Bridge Notes were
$935,250. All of the Bridge Notes were converted voluntarily by the holders of the Bridge Notes
into 1,535,715 shares of our common stock (the Bridge Shares), at a conversion price of $0.70 per
share, on or prior to the maturity date of the Bridge Notes on May 31, 2006.
37
Table of Contents
In 2006, we have raised capital through the sale of our common stock, to provide some of the
funds necessary to continue to execute on our business plan. In April, 2006, we conducted an
offering (the Overseas Offering) and sold 473,000 shares of our common stock at $1.56 per share
and issued
warrants to purchase up to 118,250 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $2.60 per
share, to two overseas investors. We raised $737,881 gross proceeds ($667,803 net proceeds) in
this offering.
In May 2006, we conducted an offering (the PIPE Offering) and sold 873,018 shares of our
common stock (the PIPE Shares) at $1.89 per share and issued warrants (the PIPE Warrants) to
purchase up to 436,511 shares of our common stock at $2.70 per share, through our exclusive
placement agent, Spencer Clarke LLC of New York. We raised $1,650,009 gross proceeds ($1,435,508
net proceeds) in the PIPE Offering.
On June 28, 2006, we filed a registration statement to register the Bridge Shares and the PIPE
Shares, and the shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of the Bridge Warrants, the PIPE
Warrants and warrants issued to Spencer Clarke LLC for various investment banking and other related
services, including services in connection with the Bridge Offering, the Overseas Offering and the
PIPE Offering. The registration statement was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the SEC) on July 24, 2006.
During the three-month period ended June 30, 2006, we also raised $964,500 gross and net
proceeds through the exercises of outstanding warrants. Subsequent to the end of the three-month
period ended June 30, 2006 and through August 7, 2006, we raised an additional $225,000 gross and
net proceeds through the exercise of outstanding warrants.
We believe that exercises of in-the-money options and warrants, together with sales of our
securities in other financings we have undertaken and may undertake in the future, will provide
most of the proceeds needed to meet our capital requirements on a going forward basis. However,
there can be no assurance that additional equity or debt financing will be available or available
on terms favorable to us. If we are unable to obtain additional financing, we may be required to
delay, reduce the scope of, or eliminate, our ongoing research and development programs, reduce our
marketing and sales activities, or relinquish rights to technologies that we might otherwise seek
to develop or commercialize.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based upon our
Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these Financial Statements and related
disclosures requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We evaluate, on
an on-going basis, our estimates and judgments, including those related to the useful life of the
assets. We base our estimates on historical experience and assumptions that we believe to be
reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about
the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
Actual results may differ from these estimates.
The methods, estimates and judgments we use in applying our most critical accounting
policies have a significant impact on the results that we report in our Financial Statements. The
SEC considers an entitys most critical accounting policies to be those policies that are both most
important to the portrayal of a companys financial condition and results of operations and those
that require managements most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the
need to make estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain at the time of estimation. We
believe the following critical accounting policies, among others, require significant judgments and
estimates used in the preparation of our Financial Statements:
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported
38
Table of Contents
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Certain significant estimates were
made in connection with preparing our financial statements as described in Note 2 to Notes
to Financial Statements. See Part I, Item 1, Financial Statements. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
Stock-Based Compensation
On January 1, 2006, we adopted Statements of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised
2004), Share-Based Payment, (SFAS 123R), which requires the measurement and recognition of
compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors based on
estimated fair values. SFAS 123R supersedes our previous accounting under Accounting Principles
Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25) for periods beginning
in fiscal 2006. In March 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 107 (SAB 107) relating to SFAS 123R. We have applied the provisions of SAB 107 in
our adoption of SFAS 123R.
We adopted SFAS 123R using the modified prospective transition method, which requires the
application of the accounting standard as of January 1, 2006, the first day of our 2006 fiscal
year. Stock-based compensation expense recognized under SFAS 123R for employees and directors for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 was $736,285 and $1,214,775, respectively. Basic and
diluted loss per share would have been $(0.07) for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 and $(0.15) for
the six months ended June 30, 2006, if we had not adopted SFAS 123R, compared to reported basic and
diluted loss per share of $(0.09) and $(0.18) per share, respectively. As of June 30, 2006 there is
$1,271,649 of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested options that are expected to
vest through February 2007. The weighted average period over which this expense is to be recognized
is approximately three months.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 151, Inventory Costs. This Statement amends the
guidance in ARB No. 43 Chapter 4 Inventory Pricing, to require items such as idle facility costs,
excessive spoilage, double freight and rehandling costs to be expensed in the current period,
regardless if they are abnormal amounts or not. This Statement will become effective for us in the
first quarter of 2006. The adoption of SFAS No. 151 is not expected to have a material impact on
our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
In May 2005, the FASB issued Statement No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error
Corrections a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3 (SFAS No.
154). SFAS No. 154 changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a
change in accounting principle. APB Opinion 20 previously required that most voluntary
changes in accounting principle be recognized by including in net income of the period of
the change the cumulative effect of changing to the new accounting principle. SFAS No. 154
requires retrospective application to prior periods financial statements of changes in
accounting principle, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific
effects of the cumulative effect of the change. In the event of such impracticality, SFAS
No. 154 provides for other means of application. In the event the Company changes
accounting principles, it will evaluate the impact of SFAS No. 154.
Item 3. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures: Our management evaluated, with the
participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have
concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-
39
Table of Contents
15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)) are not adequate to ensure that information
required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and
forms. We have developed, and have partially implemented, a plan to ensure that all information
will be recorded, processed, summarized and reported on a timely basis. This plan is dependent, in
part, upon reallocation of responsibilities among various personnel, hiring additional personnel
and additional funding. We began to implement this plan during 2005, including the hiring in August
2005 of a Controller who is a Certified Public Accountant. It should also be noted that the design
of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future
events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals
under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.
(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting: There was no change in our internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this Quarterly Report
on Form 10-QSB that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
40
Table of Contents
PART II
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
On December 19, 2001, the SEC filed civil charges in the United States Federal
District Court, Southern District of New York, against us, our former President and then
sole director Jeffrey A. Muller, and others, alleging that we and the other defendants were
engaged in a fraudulent scheme to promote our stock. The SEC complaint alleged the existence
of a promotional campaign using press releases, Internet postings, an elaborate website, and
televised media events to disseminate false and materially misleading information as part of
a fraudulent scheme to manipulate the market for stock in our corporation, which was then
controlled by Mr. Muller. On March 22, 2002, we signed a Consent to Final Judgment of
Permanent Injunction and Other Relief in settlement of this action as against the
corporation only, which the court approved on July 2, 2002. Under this settlement, we were
not required to admit fault and did not pay any fines or restitution. The SECs charges of
fraud and stock manipulation continue against Mr. Muller and others.
On July 2, 2002, after an investigation by our newly constituted board of directors, we
filed a cross-complaint in the SEC action against Mr. Muller and others seeking injunctive relief,
disgorgement of monies and stock and financial restitution for a variety of acts and omissions in
connection with sales of our stock and other transactions occurring between 1998 and 2002. Among
other things, we alleged that Mr. Muller and certain others sold Company stock without providing
adequate consideration to us; sold insider shares without making proper disclosures and failed to
make necessary filing required under federal securities laws; engaged in self-dealing and entered
into various undisclosed related-party transactions; misappropriated for their own use proceeds
from sales of our stock; and entered into various undisclosed arrangement regarding the control,
voting and disposition of their stock. On July 30, 2002, the U.S. Federal District Court, Southern
District of New York, granted our application for a preliminary injunction against Mr. Muller and
others, which prevented Mr. Muller and other cross-defendants from selling, transferring, or
encumbering any assets and property previously acquired from us, from selling or transferring any
of our stock that they may own or control, or from taking any action to injure us or our business
and from having any direct contact with our shareholders. The injunctive order also prevents Mr.
Muller from engaging in any effort to exercise control over our corporation and from serving as an
officer or director of our company. While we believe that we have valid claims, there can be no
assurance that an adverse result or settlement would not have a material adverse effect on our
financial position or cash flow.
In the course of the litigation, we have obtained ownership control over Mr. Mullers claimed
patent rights to the ZEFStm device. Under a Buy-Sell Agreement between Mr.
Muller and dated December 29, 1998, Mr. Muller, who was listed on the ZEFS devise patent
application as the inventor of the ZEFS device, purported to grant us all international marketing,
manufacturing and distribution rights to the ZEFS device. Those rights were disputed because an
original inventor of the ZEFS device contested Mr. Mullers legal ability to have conveyed those
rights.
In Australia, Mr. Muller entered into a bankruptcy action seeking to overcome our claims for
ownership of the ZEFS device. In conjunction with these litigation proceedings, a settlement
agreement was reached with the bankruptcy trustee whereby the $10 per unit royalty previously due
to Mr. Muller under his contested Buy-Sell Agreement was terminated and replaced with a $.20 per
unit royalty payable to the bankruptcy trustee. On November 7, 2002, under a settlement agreement
executed with Mr. Mullers bankruptcy trustee, the trustee transferred to us all ownership and
legal rights to this international patent application for the ZEFS device.
Both the SEC and we filed Motions for Summary Judgment contending that there are no
material issues of fact in contention and as a matter of law, the Court should grant a
judgment against Mr. Muller and the cross-defendants.
41
Table of Contents
Mr. Muller and several of the defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the complaint filed by us
and moved for summary judgment in their favor. On December 28, 2004, Judge George B. Daniels,
denied the cross-defendants motion to dismiss our cross-complaint, denied the defendants request
to vacate the July 2, 2002 preliminary injunction and denied their request for damages against us.
The court also refused to grant a summary judgment in favor of the cross-defendants and dismissed
Mr. Mullers claims against us for indemnification for his legal costs and for damages resulting
from the litigation. Neither Mr. Muller nor any of the cross-defendants have filed any cross-claims
against us and we are not exposed to any liability as a result of the litigation, except for
possibly incurring legal fees and expenses should we lose the litigation.
On November 16, 2005, the Court granted the SECs motion for summary judgment. In granting the
motion, the Court has barred Mr. Muller from serving as an officer or director of a public company
for a period of 20 years, ordered Mr. Muller to disgorge any shares of our stock that he still owns
and directed the Company to cancel any issued and outstanding shares of our stock still owned by
Mr. Muller. Mr. Muller was also ordered to disgorge to the SEC unlawful profits in the amount of
$7.5 million and a pay a civil penalty in the amount of $100,000. Acting in accordance with the
ruling and decision of the Court, we have canceled (i) 8,047,403 shares of its common stock held by
Mr. Muller and/or his affiliates, (ii) options to acquire an additional 10,000,000 shares of our
common stock held by Mr. Muller personally and (iii) $1,017,208 of debt which Mr. Muller claimed
was owed to him by the Company.
In response to the November 16, 2005 decision by the Court, Muller filed a motion seeking to
set aside the Decision and Order of the Court. On March 31, 2006, the Court issued a Decision and
Order denying Mullers Motion to set aside the Decision on Summary Judgment issued against Muller
on November 16, 2005.
A final decision on the motion for summary judgment filed by us, which potentially would
terminate the ongoing litigation, is still pending. Should the Court not grant summary judgment in
our favor, the case will be scheduled for final disposition in a trial. Although the outcome of
this litigation cannot be predicted with any degree of certainty, we are optimistic that, based
upon previous developments in the litigation and the Courts granting of the SECs motion for
summary judgment, the Courts ruling on our motion for summary judgment will either significantly
narrow the issues for any later trial or will result in a final disposition of the case in a manner
favorable to us.
In April 2005, Jeffrey A. Muller, the Companys former sole director and executive officer,
filed a complaint against us in the Federal District Court for the Central District of California,
seeking declaratory and injunctive relief and alleging unfair competition in connection with a
claimed prior patent interest in the ZEFS device and stock option rights. In seeking declaratory
relief, Mr. Muller is seeking to have the patent rights in the ZEFS device that were previously
transferred to us by Mr. Mullers bankruptcy trustee declared null and void.
This lawsuit brought by Mr. Muller arose out of the same claims that are the subject of
ongoing litigation in the Federal District Court for the Southern District of New York, in which we
have previously obtained a preliminary injunction against Mr. Muller barring him from any
involvement with the Company and preventing Mr. Muller, his agents or assigns, from exercising any
claimed rights to our assets or stock. Mr. Muller previously filed the same complaint in the
Federal District Court for the Southern District of New York, which claim is still pending. On
December 28, 2004, Federal District Court Judge George B. Daniels issued a decision dismissing
motions filed by Mr. Muller against our cross-claims. The dismissal of those motions involved
similar causes of action as those contained in Mr. Mullers recent lawsuit commenced in the Federal
District Court for the Central District of California. Since the case in New York is still pending,
we believe that the filing of the new lawsuit in California is subject to various defenses which
should result in the dismissal of the new lawsuit.
On January 25, 2006, Mr. Mullers complaint, filed in the California District Court and
transferred to the Federal Court in the Southern District of New York, was assigned to Judge George
B. Daniels. It is expected that the Court will consolidate that complaint with the already pending
claims encompassed within our Motion for Summary Judgment. While we believe that
42
Table of Contents
we have valid
claims and defenses, there can be no assurance that an adverse result or outcome on the pending
motions or a trial of this case would not have a material adverse effect on our financial position
or cash flow.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
In April 2006, we sold an aggregate 473,000 shares of common stock at $1.56 per share and
issued warrants to purchase up to 118,250 additional shares of common stock at $2.60 per share, to
two investors, in the Overseas Offering. These warrants are exercisable immediately and can be
exercised until April 21, 2008. In addition, warrants exercisable for 11,825 shares of our common
stock were issued to our exclusive placement agent, Spencer Clarke LLC of New York, in connection
with the Overseas Offering. We received $737,881 gross proceeds and $667,803 net proceeds in this
offering. This offering was made to individuals who are not U.S. persons as that term is defined
in Rule 902 of Regulation S promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
Securities Act).
Also in April 2006, the Company issued a five-year warrant to one service provider in
connection with services to be provided. The warrant is exercisable for up to 100,000
shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.30 per share and vests as to 8,333
shares per month commencing April 30, 2006. The shares issuable upon exercise of the
warrant have piggyback registration rights. The issuance of this warrant was made in
reliance on the exemptions from registration set forth in Section 4(2) of the Securities
Act or Regulation D promulgated thereunder.
In May 2006, we sold 873,018 PIPE Shares at $1.89 per share and issued PIPE
Warrants to purchase up to 436,511 shares of our common stock at $2.70 per share. The PIPE Warrants
are exercisable immediately and can be exercised until May 24, 2009. In addition, warrants
exercisable for 87,302 shares of our common stock were issued to our exclusive placement agent,
Spencer Clarke LLC of New York, or their affiliates, in connection with the PIPE Offering. We
received $1,650,009 gross proceeds and $1,435,508 net proceeds in the PIPE Offering. The issuance
of the convertible notes and warrants described above were made in reliance on the exemptions from
registration set forth in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act or Regulation D promulgated
thereunder.
During the three-month period ended June 30, 2006, we issued 1,535,715 shares of common stock
in connection with the conversion of $1,075,000 aggregate principal amount of our Bridge Notes and
243,707 shares of common stock in connection with the conversion of $167,000 aggregate principal
amount of our Investor Notes, including accrued interest. Subsequent to the end of the three-month
period ended June 30, 2006 and through August 7, 2006, we issued 1,540,160 shares of common stock
in connection with the conversion of $1,078,112 aggregate principal amount of our Investor Notes,
including accrued interest. Additionally, as of August 7, 2006, we had not yet issued an
additional 70,940 shares of common stock in connection with the conversion of an additional $49,658
aggregate principal amount of our Investor Notes. The Company did not receive any proceeds in
connection with the conversion of the Investor Notes and Bridge Notes. The issuances of the shares
of common stock upon conversion of Investor Notes and Bridge Notes described above were made in
reliance on the exemptions from registration set forth in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act or
Regulation D promulgated thereunder.
During the three-month period ended June 30, 2006, we issued 1,599,000 shares of common stock
in connection with the exercise of outstanding warrants, for which we received $964,500 gross and
net proceeds. Subsequent to the end of the three-month period ended June 30, 2006 and through
August 7, 2006, we issued 150,000 shares of common stock in connection with exercise of outstanding
warrants, for which we received $225,000 gross and net proceeds. The issuances of the shares of
common stock upon the exercise of the warrants described above were made in reliance on the
exemptions from registration set forth in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act or Regulation D
promulgated thereunder.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
43
Table of Contents
None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
We held our annual meeting of stockholders on May 19, 2006. At that meeting, our stockholders:
1. | Elected seven directors to serve until our 2006 annual meeting of stockholders or until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified: |
Name | For | Withheld | ||||||
Eugene E. Eichler |
21,658,928 | 1,547,353 | ||||||
Bruce H. McKinnon |
21,790,419 | 1,415,862 | ||||||
John Brown |
21,756,613 | 1,449,668 | ||||||
John F. Price |
22,941,988 | 264,293 | ||||||
Joseph Helleis |
22,941,136 | 265,145 | ||||||
Cecil Kyte |
22,941,136 | 265,145 |
2. | Approved the amendment of the Save the World Air, Inc. 2004 Stock Option Plan: |
Votes For |
13,540,022 | |||
Votes Against |
1,536,760 | |||
Abstentions |
90,915 | |||
Broker Non-Votes |
8,038,584 |
3. | Ratified the appointment of Weinberg & Company, P.A., as our independent auditors for the current fiscal year: |
Votes For |
22,903,013 | |||
Votes Against |
288,416 | |||
Abstentions |
14,852 | |||
Broker Non-Votes |
0 |
Item 5. Other Information
On August 8, 2006, the Board of Directors (the Board) of the Company, upon the
recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board, approved and
authorized a revision to the Companys non-employee director compensation policy to provide that,
effective August 8, 2006, equity compensation may be granted to non-employee directors pursuant to
the Companys then-current equity incentive plan, or as may otherwise be determined by the Board.
In addition, the Board approved a change in cash compensation to be paid to non-employee directors
effective August 8, 2006.
On August 8, 2006, the Board approved the payment of annual cash compensation to non-employee
directors, effective as of such date, as follows:
Board Member |
$ | 7,500 | ||
Chairman of the Board |
$ | 25,000 | ||
Audit Committee Chair |
$ | 20,000 | ||
Compensation Committee Chair |
$ | 15,000 | ||
Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee Chair |
$ | 15,000 |
Additionally, each such Board member will receive $1,000 for each Board meeting he attends,
whether in person or telephonically. Each such Board member, including committee
44
Table of Contents
chairs, will also
receive $500 for each committee meeting he attends, whether in person or telephonically
Also on August 8, 2006, the Board authorized a grant to each non-employee director, and to
former director Robert Sylk, of an option to purchase 30,000 shares of the Companys common stock
at an exercise price of $2.255 per share, being the closing price of the Companys common stock on
August 7, 2006, each such option to vest fully on August 8, 2007 and remain exercisable for five
years from the date of grant, with the exception of Robert Sylk, whose option vests immediately and
is execisable for one year from the date of grant.
On August 8, 2006, the Compensation Committee of the Board approved an increase in base annual
salary to John R. Bautista, III, Executive Vice President of Operations, from $150,000 to $200,000,
effective as of such date. All other terms of Mr. Bautistas amended and restated employment
agreement dated as of March 1, 2006 remain in effect.
On August 8, 2006, the Board named Bruce H. McKinnon Chief Operating Officer of the Company.
Mr. McKinnon will also continue to serve as President of the Company.
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit No. | Description | |
10.1
|
Summary of non-employee director compensation | |
10.2
|
Summary of compensation for John Bautista | |
31.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Quarterly Report Pursuant to Rule 13(a)-15(e) or Rule 15(d)-15(e) | |
31.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Quarterly Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 | |
32
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Quarterly Report pursuant to Rule 13(a)-15(e) or Rule 15(d)-15(e) |
| Management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement |
45
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the Registrant has caused this
Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.
Date: August 11, 2006 | SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC. |
|||
By: | /s/ EUGENE E. EICHLER | |||
Eugene E. Eichler | ||||
Chief Executive Officer | ||||
46
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. | Description | |
10.1
|
Summary of non-employee director compensation | |
10.2
|
Summary of amended compensation for John Richard Bautista III | |
31.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Quarterly Report Pursuant to Rule 13(a)-15(e) or Rule 15(d)-15(e) | |
31.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Quarterly Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 | |
32
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Quarterly Report pursuant to Rule 13(a)-15(e) or Rule 15(d)-15(e) |
| Management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement |
47