UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013

or

For the transition period from __________ to __________

Commission File Number 0-29185

SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

735 State Street, Suite 500

Santa Barbara, California 93101

(Address, including zip code, of principal executive offices)

(805)-845-3561

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None.

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: Common Stock, $0.001 par value.

Check whether the Registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes S No £

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes S No £

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes £ No S

The number of shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock outstanding as of July 31, 2013 was 165,243,632.

SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC.

FORM 10-Q

INDEX

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Unaudited Financial Statements

SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)

SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC. AND

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(continued)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013 AND 2012

Description of business

Save The World Air, Inc. (“STWA”, “Company”) was incorporated on February 18, 1998, as a Nevada Corporation under the name Mandalay Capital Corporation. The company changed its name to Save the World Air, Inc. on February 11, 1999, following the acquisition of the marketing and manufacturing rights of the ZEFS technologies. Our executive offices are at 735 State Street, Suite 500, Santa Barbara, California 93101. The telephone number is (805) 845-3561. The Company’s common stock is quoted under the symbol “ZERO” on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board. More information including the Company’s fact sheet, logos and media articles are available at our corporate website, www.stwa.com.

STWA develops and intends to commercialize energy efficiency technologies that assist in meeting increasing global energy demands, improving the economics of oil extraction and transport, and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The Company's intellectual property portfolio includes 47 domestic and international patents and patents pending, which have been developed in conjunction with and exclusively licensed from Temple University. STWA's primary technology is called Applied Oil Technology™ (AOT™), a commercial-grade crude oil pipeline transportation flow-assurance product. AOT™ has been proven in U.S. Department of Energy tests to increase the energy efficiency of oil pipeline pump stations. The AOT product has transitioned from the research and development stage to initial commercial production for the midstream pipeline marketplace. The Company is actively engaged in research and development related to the optimization and value engineering of its commercial midstream pipeline AOT product and the development of complementary AOT product lines.

Basis of presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Save the World Air, Inc. have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and pursuant to the requirements for reporting on Form 10-Q and Regulation S-K for scaled disclosures for smaller reporting companies. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in United States of America for complete financial statements. However, such information reflects all adjustments (consisting solely of normal recurring adjustments), which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for the fair presentation of the consolidated financial position and the consolidated results of operations. Results shown for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be obtained for a full fiscal year. Certain prior year’s amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period presentations.

The consolidated balance sheet information as of December 31, 2012 was derived from the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 22, 2013. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with that report.

Going concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. The Company is in the development stage and has not generated any significant revenues from operations to date, and does not expect to do so in the foreseeable future. The Company has experienced recurring operating losses and negative operating cash flows since inception, and has financed its working capital requirements through the recurring sale of its convertible notes and equity securities. As reflected in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements, the Company had a negative cash flow from operations of $2,811,121 for the six month period ended June 30, 2013 and accumulated deficit of $82,720,004 at June 30, 2012. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company’s ability to raise additional funds and implement its business plan. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

At June 30, 2013, the Company had cash on hand in the amount of $4,505,736. Management expects that the current funds on hand will be sufficient to continue operations through June 2014. Management is currently seeking additional funds, primarily through the issuance of debt and equity securities for cash to operate our business, including without limitation the expenses it will incur in connection with the license and research and development agreements with Temple University; costs associated with product development and commercialization of the AOT technology; costs to manufacture and ship the products; costs to design and implement an effective system of internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures; costs of maintaining our status as a public company by filing periodic reports with the SEC and costs required to protect our intellectual property. In addition, as discussed below, the Company has substantial contractual commitments, including without limitation salaries to our executive officers pursuant to employment agreements, certain severance payments to a former officer and consulting fees, during the remainder of 2013 and beyond.

No assurance can be given that any future financing will be available or, if available, that it will be on terms that are satisfactory to the Company. Even if the Company is able to obtain additional financing, it may contain undue restrictions on our operations, in the case of debt financing or cause substantial dilution for our stock holders, in case of equity financing.

Development stage enterprise 

The Company is a development stage enterprise.  All losses accumulated since the inception of the Company have been considered as part of the Company’s development stage activities.

The Company’s focus is on product development and marketing of proprietary devices that are designed to improve the operational parameters of petrochemical pipeline transport systems and has not yet generated meaningful revenues.  The Company is currently transitioning from the product development cycle to the commercial manufacturing and sales cycle.  Expenses have been funded through the sale of shares of common stock for cash, issuance of convertible notes for cash and the proceeds from exercise of options and warrants.  The Company has taken actions to secure the intellectual property rights to the proprietary technologies and is the worldwide exclusive licensee for the intellectual property the Company co-developed with its intellectual property partner, Temple University of Philadelphia, PA.

Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Certain significant estimates were made in connection with preparing the Company’s financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates

Basic Income per share

The Company’s computation of earnings per share (“EPS”) includes basic and diluted EPS.  Basic EPS is measured as the income (loss) available to common stockholders divided by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period.  Diluted EPS is similar to basic EPS but presents the dilutive effect on a per share basis of potential common shares (e.g., warrants and options) as if they had been converted at the beginning of the periods presented, or issuance date, if later.  Potential common shares that have an anti-dilutive effect (i.e., those that increase income per share or decrease loss per share) are excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS.

Income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the respective periods. Basic and diluted (loss) per common share is the same for periods in which the company reported an operating loss because all warrants and stock options outstanding are anti-dilutive.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company periodically issues stock options and warrants to employees and non-employees in non-capital raising transactions for services and for financing costs. The Company accounts for stock option and warrant grants issued and vesting to employees based on the authoritative guidance provided by the Financial Accounting Standards Board whereas the value of the award is measured on the date of grant and recognized over the vesting period. The Company accounts for stock option and warrant grants issued and vesting to non-employees in accordance with the authoritative guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board whereas the value of the stock compensation is based upon the measurement date as determined at either a) the date at which a performance commitment is reached, or b) at the date at which the necessary performance to earn the equity instruments is complete. Non-employee stock-based compensation charges generally are amortized over the vesting period on a straight-line basis. In certain circumstances where there are no future performance requirements by the non-employee, option grants are immediately vested and the total stock-based compensation charge is recorded in the period of the measurement date.

The fair value of the Company's common stock option grant is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which uses certain assumptions related to risk-free interest rates, expected volatility, expected life of the common stock options, and future dividends. Compensation expense is recorded based upon the value derived from the Black-Scholes option pricing model, and based on actual experience. The assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model could materially affect compensation expense recorded in future periods.

Accounting for Warrants and Derivatives

The Company evaluates all of its financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported in the consolidated statements of operations. For stock-based derivative financial instruments, the Company uses a probability weighted average series Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing models to value the derivative instruments at inception and on subsequent valuation dates.

The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is evaluated at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument could be required within 12 months of the balance sheet date. 

Fair value of financial instruments 

Effective January 1, 2008, fair value measurements are determined by the Company's adoption of authoritative guidance issued by the FASB, with the exception of the application of the statement to non-recurring, non-financial assets and liabilities as permitted. The adoption of the authoritative guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's fair value measurements. Fair value is defined in the authoritative guidance as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. A fair value hierarchy was established, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value into three broad levels as follows:

Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2—Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, are observable either directly or indirectly.

Level 3—Unobservable inputs based on the Company's assumptions.

The Company is required to use observable market data if such data is available without undue cost and effort

The following table presents certain investments and liabilities of the Company’s financial assets measured and recorded at fair value on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets on a recurring basis and their level within the fair value hierarchy as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements  

In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-01, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. This ASU clarifies which instruments and transactions are subject to the offsetting disclosure requirements established by ASU 2011-11. This guidance is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning January 1, 2013. We do not believe the adoption of this update will have a material effect on our financial position and results of operations.

Other accounting pronouncements did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company's present or future consolidated financial statements.

Reclassification

In presenting the Company’s statement of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012, the Company reclassified certain salary and consulting expenses in the aggregate of $72,000 and $140,000 respectively that were previously reflected as operating expenses to research and development expenses.

In presenting the Company’s statement of operations from inception to June 30, 2013, the Company reclassified certain salary and consulting expenses in the aggregate $531,500 previously reflected as operating expenses to research and development expenses.

Accounts Payable to related parties

As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company had accounts payable to related parties in the amount of $85,589 and $65,192, respectively. These amounts are unpaid Directors Fees and expenses incurred by officers and directors.

Accrued expense due to related parties

As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company accrued unpaid salaries, unused vacation and the corresponding payroll taxes of its employees in the aggregate of $350,138 and $468,086, respectively. Included in these accruals are accrued vacation and payroll taxes in the aggregate of $64,709 and $57,657, respectively, and the unpaid salaries of the former President of the Company of $225,429 and $255,429, respectively, and the former Chief Financial Officer of the Company of $60,000 and $155,000, respectively. The Company agreed to a monthly payment of $5,000 up to $15,000 to these former officers of the Company until their unpaid salaries are fully settled. 

Consulting fees paid to related parties

Ryan Zinke, a director of the Company, is the Chief Executive Officer of consulting firm, Continental Divide LLC. During the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company incurred fees for consulting services of $30,000 and $0, respectively.

During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company issued 19,937,130 shares of common stock upon exercise of warrants at $0.25 to $0.40 per share for gross proceeds of $5,779,660. The Company incurred direct costs in the amount of $78,521 in commissions and foreign exchange fees paid on warrants exercised by foreign (non-U.S.) investors for aggregate net proceeds of $5,701,139.

During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company issued 50,000 shares of common stock for consulting services provided valued at $49,000, or $0.98 per share. The shares issued were valued at the trading price at the date of the agreement.

The Company periodically issues stock options and warrants to employees and non-employees in capital raising transactions, for services and for financing costs. Options vest and expire according to terms established at the grant date.

Options 

The Company sometimes issues stock options to employees, directors and consultants under the 2004 Stock Option Plan (the Plan). The Company could issue options under the Plan to acquire up to 5,000,000 shares of common stock. In February 2006, the board approved an amendment to the Plan (approved by the Shareholders in May 2006), increasing the authorized shares by 2,000,000 shares to 7,000,000 shares. At June 30, 2013, 2,750,442 were available to be granted under the Plan. Prior to 2004, the Company granted 3,250,000 options outside the Plan to officers of the Company.

The following table summarizes certain information about the Company’s stock purchase options from January 1, 2013 to June 30, 2013:

The weighted average exercise prices, remaining contractual lives for options granted, exercisable, and expected to vest under the Plan as of June 30, 2013 were as follows:

The Company’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), holders of options to purchase shares of common stock in the aggregate of 22,700,000 shares, each signed a declaration providing additional restriction on conditions under which they could exercise vested options to purchase stock. Specifically, the CEO and CFO are restricted from exercising options (“Restricted Options”) until the Company has authorized additional shares in its articles of incorporation such that the execution of the Restricted Options could not cause outstanding shares to exceed the current authorized shares on a fully diluted basis. In the absence of this restriction, the total exercisable shares as of June 30, 2013 would be 13,688,098.

During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company amortized $870,369 of compensation cost based on the vesting of the options granted to employees in prior periods. Future unamortized compensation expense on the outstanding options at June 30, 2013 is $4,310,665.

Warrants

In March 2013, pursuant to a settlement of debt agreement, the Company granted a consultant a warrant to purchase 150,000 shares of its common stock with an exercise price of $0.30 per share, vesting immediately and expiring in two years from grant date (see Note 8, below). The fair value of the warrant amounted to $129,622 using the Black-Scholes Merton valuation model with the following average assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 0.26%; dividend yield of 0%; volatility of 132%; and an expected life of two years.

During the period ended June 30, 2013, the Company recognized amortization expense of $52,631 based upon vesting of the warrants granted to an employee and a consultant in prior year.

The following table summarizes certain information about the Company’s stock purchase warrants from January 1, 2013 to June 30, 2013:

Future unamortized compensation expense on the outstanding warrants at June 30, 2013 is approximately $227,584.

AOT Testing

The Company has concluded conducting research and development of its AOT technology prototypes in a testing facility in Midwest, Wyoming, located at the U.S. Department of Energy Rocky Mountain Oilfield Testing Center, Naval Petroleum Reserve #3 (US DOE). The Company constructs the AOT technology prototypes through the assistance of various third party entities, located in Casper, Wyoming. Costs incurred and expensed included fees charged by the US DOE, purchase of test equipment, pipeline pumping equipment, crude oil tank batteries, viscometers, SCADA systems, computer equipment and other related equipment and various logistical expenses for the purposes of evaluating and testing its AOT prototypes.

The Company incurred costs of $582,174 and $327,751 for the six month period ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and has been reflected in Research and Development expenses on the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations.

Temple University Research & Development Agreement

On August 1, 2011, the Company and Temple University (“Temple”) entered into two (2) Exclusive License Agreements (collectively, the “License Agreements”) relating to Temple’s patent applications, patents and technical information pertaining to technology associated with an electric and/or magnetic field assisted fuel injector system (the “First Temple License”), and to technology to reduce crude oil viscosity (the “Second Temple License”). The License Agreements are exclusive and the territory licensed to the Company is worldwide and replace previously issued License Agreements.

Pursuant to the two licensing agreements, the Company agreed to pay Temple the following: (i) non-refundable license maintenance fee of $300,000; (ii) annual maintenance fees of $187,500; (iii) royalty fee ranging from 4% up to 7% from revenues generated from the licensing agreements; and (iv) 25% of all revenues generated from sub-licensees to secure or maintain the sub-license or option thereon. The term of the licenses commenced in August 2011 and will expire upon the expiration of the patents. The agreement can also be terminated by either party upon notification under terms of the licensing agreements or if the Company ceases the development of the patent or failure to commercialize the patent rights.

In January 2013, the Company and Temple agreed to defer payment of an amount due under the sponsored research agreement (discussed below) pending renegotiation of a separate research and development agreement with Temple.

Total expenses recognized during the six month period ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 pursuant to these two agreements amounted to $93,750 and $93,750 respectively and has been reflected in Research and Development expenses on the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations.

As of June 30, 2013, there were no revenues generated from these two licenses.

As of June 30, 2013, the Company accrued a total of $209,375 pursuant to these licensing agreements which are included as part of Accounts Payable – licensing agreement in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Temple University Sponsored Research Agreement

On March 19, 2012, the Company entered into a Sponsored Research Agreement (“Research Agreement”) with Temple University (“Temple”), whereby Temple, under the direction of Dr. Rongjia Tao, will perform ongoing research related to the Company’s AOT device (the “Project”), for the period April 1, 2012, through April 1, 2014.  All rights and title to intellectual property resulting from Temple’s work related to the Project shall be subject to the Exclusive License Agreements between Temple and the Company, dated August 1, 2011.  In exchange for Temple’s research efforts on the Project, the Company has agreed to pay Temple $500,000, payable in eight quarterly installments of $62,500.

In January 2013, the Company and Temple agreed to defer payment of the amount due pending renegotiation of the Research Agreement. In May 2013, parties mutually agreed to suspend further accruals of the amount due and restructure both the scope and cost of future research funding under this agreement as the Company moves from development mode towards commercial operations. The Company expects that a new Research Agreement will be finalized in September 2013 at a reduced rate. Furthermore, the Company made a $100,000 payment deemed to bring the Company current in its obligation to Temple and parties have mutually agreed the Company is not in default under the Research Agreement.

During the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company recognized a total of $83,333 and $62,500 respectively, pursuant to this agreement and has been reflected in Research and Development expenses on the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations.

As of June 30, 2013, the Company accrued a total of $170,833 pursuant to this agreement which is included as part of Accounts Payable – licensing agreement in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.   

In June 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on determining whether an instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to an entity’s own stock. Under the authoritative guidance, effective January 1, 2010, instruments which do not have fixed settlement provisions are deemed to be derivative instruments. The strike price of the warrants issued by the Company, in connection with certain convertible note offerings made during 2009 and 2010, in the aggregate of 8,522,500 warrants, exercisable at $0.30 per share, contains exercise prices that may fluctuate based on the occurrence of future offerings or events. As a result, these warrants were not considered indexed to the Company’s own stock. The Company characterized the fair value of these warrants as derivative liabilities upon issuance. The FASB’s guidance requires the fair value of these liabilities be re-measured at the end of every reporting period with the change in value reported in the accompanying statement of operations. At December 31, 2012, a total of 4,412,500 warrants remain outstanding with a fair value of $3,221,138.

In January 2013, 4,112,500 warrants were exercised and the remaining 300,000 warrants expired unexercised at which time the warrants had a fair value of $3,441,752, which resulted in a loss of $220,614 due to the change in the fair value. Furthermore, as a result of the exercise and expiration of these warrants, the Company recorded a gain of $3,441,752 due to the extinguishment of the corresponding derivative liability.

The derivative liabilities were valued using a probability weighted average series of Black-Scholes-Merton models as a valuation technique, which approximates the Monte Carlo and other binominal valuation techniques with the following assumptions:

The risk-free interest rate is based on the yield available on U.S. Treasury securities. The Company estimates volatility based on the historical volatility of its common stock. The expected life warrants are based on the expiration date of the related warrants. The expected dividend yield was based on the fact that the Company has not paid dividends to stockholders in the past nor is it expected to pay any dividends in the foreseeable future.

In March 2013, the Company settled a debt incurred in prior year amounting to $147,328 for $85,000 plus a warrant to purchase 150,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $129,622 (see Note 5, above). As a result, the Company also recognized a loss of $67,294 on the settlement.

Legal matters

There is no litigation of any significance with the exception of the matters that have arisen under, and are being handled in, the normal course of business.

Increase in Outstanding Shares

During the period from July 1, 2013 through July 31, 2013, the Company issued 1,588,932 shares through grants of common stock to employees as compensation and through the execution of warrants. Employee stock grants totaled 179,000 shares at $1.09 per share at an aggregate cost of $195,110. Stock issued through warrant execution totaled 1,409,932 shares at $0.30 per share for aggregate proceeds to the Company of $42,380.

Entry into a material definitive agreement

On August 1, 2013, the Company entered into an Equipment Lease/Option to Purchase Agreement (“Agreement” or “Lease”) with TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, L.P. by its agent TC Oil Pipeline Operations, Inc. (“TransCanada”), dated effective as of July 17, 2013. In accordance with the terms and conditions of the Agreement, TransCanada has agreed to lease, install, maintain, operate and test the effectiveness of the Company’s AOT technology and equipment on one of TransCanada’s operating pipelines. Under terms of the Agreement the Company will deliver the Equipment to TransCanada to be installed and placed in operation by TransCanada, at TransCanada’s expense, on a date estimated to be no later than March 1, 2014. The initial term of the lease is six (6) months, with an option to extend the lease for an additional eighty-four (84) months. TransCanada has an option to purchase equipment during the term of the lease.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include predictions regarding our future:

You can identify these and other forward-looking statements by the use of words such as “may,” “will,” “expects”, “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “continues,” or the negative of such terms, or other comparable terminology.

Forward-looking statements also include the assumptions underlying or relating to any of the foregoing statements.

Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth under the heading “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. All forward-looking statements included in this document are based on information available to us on the date hereof. We assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements.

Overview

We are a development stage Company that has not yet generated any significant revenues since our inception in February 1998. We have devoted the bulk of our efforts to the completion of the design, and the commercial manufacturing of our production models, and testing of devices and the promotion of our commercialized crude oil pipeline products in the upstream and midstream energy sector. We anticipate that these efforts will continue during 2013.

Our expenses to date have been funded primarily through the sale of shares of common stock and convertible debt, as well as proceeds from the exercise of stock purchase warrants and options. We raised capital in 2012 and will need to raise substantial additional capital in 2013, and beyond, to fund our sales and marketing efforts, continuing research and development, and certain other expenses, until our revenue base grows sufficiently.

The Company develops and intends to commercialize energy efficiency technologies that assist in meeting increasing global energy demands, improving the economics of oil extraction and transport, and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The Company's intellectual property portfolio includes 47 domestic and international patents and patents pending, which have been developed in conjunction with and exclusively licensed from Temple University. STWA's primary technology is called Applied Oil Technology™ (AOT™), a commercial-grade crude oil pipeline transportation flow-assurance product. AOT™ has been proven in U.S. Department of Energy tests to increase the energy efficiency of oil pipeline pump stations. The AOT product has transitioned from the research and development stage to initial commercial production for the midstream pipeline marketplace. The Company is actively engaged in research and development related to the optimization and value engineering of its commercial midstream pipeline AOT product and the development of complementary AOT product lines. Below is the current status of the AOT development:

AOT™ Commercialization

AOT Commercial Products

Beginning in the second quarter of 2012, the Company began the design and engineering efforts required to transition from prototype testing to full-scale commercial unit production. The Company established its supply chain, designs, drawings, engineering, certifications and specifications to comply with the engineering audit processes as dictated by the Energy Industry regulation processes. The Company’s first prototype unit known as AOT™ Midstream serial number 000001, was rolled off of the assembly line in May 2013 to support the Company’s Pilot Program installation efforts after successfully passing hydrostatic pressure testing as a fully assembled device, and passing inspection for ASME Section VIII, Division I certification. The Company has been working in a collaborative engineering environment with multiple Energy Industry companies to refine the AOT™ Midstream commercial design to comply with the stringent standards and qualification processes as dictated by independent engineering audit groups and North American industry regulatory bodies.

AOT Commercial Supply Chain

Beginning in Q3 2010, the Company began the process of establishing its supply chain for fabrication of the commercial AOT devices in Casper, Wyoming. The supply chain consists of multiple component suppliers and manufacturing companies engaged under Independent Contractor Agreements according to their respective fields of expertise. The supply chain entities are chosen for their ability to work collaboratively with STWA and for their existing relationships with current and potential future customers of the AOT systems. The external components such as pressure vessels, inlet and outlet piping header systems, personnel and equipment shelters are manufactured under contract with Power Service Inc. with offices in Casper, Wyoming, Green River, Wyoming, Salt Lake City, Utah, Denver, Colorado, Billings, Montana, Dickinson, North Dakota and San Antonio, Texas. The AOT internal components such as gridpacks, electrical connections and other machined parts are manufactured by Industrial Screen and Maintenance, with offices in Casper, Wyoming, and Grand Junction, Colorado. All parts are manufactured in the United States of America, using only American raw materials for quality control and import/export compliance purposes and meet the certifications and specifications as dictated by our customers and their independent oversight and auditing authorities.

Other components such as power systems, electrical junction boxes, cabling, hardware, switches, circuit breakers, computer equipment, sensors, SCADA/PLC, software and other power and integration equipment are purchased as complete units from various suppliers with operations based throughout North America. All component vendors are also required to meet or exceed the same specifications as the AOT parts manufacturers to maintain compliance as dictated by our customers and their independent oversight and auditing authorities.

AOT Intellectual Property

Beginning in Q1 2012, the Company began its own independent audit process for the updating of its intellectual property portfolio. The goal was to streamline unnecessary legacy items left over from prior management, consolidate efforts to countries and regions of interest and retire items that were no longer valid or had been replaced with new intellectual property developments. The Company internally audited its intellectual property portfolio throughout 2012, and in Q1 2013 retained the law firm of Jones Walker LLP, with operations based in Houston, Texas and began consolidation and streamlining efforts to manage intellectual properties. The Company applied for one new patent in Q2 2013.

AOT Sales and Marketing

Beginning in Q2 2012, the Company began to engage the sales and marketing processes associated with gaining early adopters of the AOT technology to their assets in commercialized form. Since that time, the Company’s executive management team has been meeting with senior level decision-makers and executives within energy industry companies based in North America, South America, Europe, Africa, Austral-Asia, and Asia for evaluation and eventual deployment of AOT systems to Upstream and Midstream operations. To support these efforts, the Company developed an hydraulic analysis modeling tool to enable the Company to generate predictive analysis for the potential benefits as generated by the AOT systems. Multiple samples of petroleum feed-stock and products were sent to the Company’s technology development co-partner, Temple University for laboratory analysis and review. In addition to their technological benefits, laboratory testing and hydraulic predictive analyses combine to provide an effective sales tool demonstrating the value proposition of AOT systems and the cost benefits of leasing or purchasing AOT equipment.

Results of Operations

We did not generate any revenue for the six-month period ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.

Operating expenses were $2,754,750 for the six month period ended June 30, 2013, compared to $3,719,719 for the six month period ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $964,969. This decrease is attributable to a decrease in non-cash expenses of $1,059,222 and offset by an increase in cash expenses of $94,253. Specifically, the decrease in non-cash expense is attributable to decreases in shares of common stock and warrants given to consultants and employees of $1,001,932, write-off of receivables of $47,000 and depreciation of $10,290. The increase in cash expense is attributable to decreases in consulting and professional fees of $109,588, offset by an increase in travel and related expenses of $85,379, office and other expenses of $19,161, and salaries and corporate expenses of $99,301.

Research and development expenses were $759,257 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2013, compared to $490,890 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012, an increase of $268,367. This increase is attributable to a decrease in salaries and consultant fees charged to research and development $58,570, off-set by an increase in product testing, research and supplies of $326,937.

Other income and expense were $3,175,856 income for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012, compared to $2,657,339 expense for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012, an increase in Other income of $5,833,195. This increase is attributable to increases in gain on extinguishment of derivative liabilities of $3,356,176, a reduction in interest and financing expense of $2,814,030 and an increase in other miscellaneous income of $7,097, offset by a reduction in other income due to the change in fair value of derivative liabilities of $53,039 and a decrease in other income of $291,069 due to settlement of debt and accruals.

We had a net loss of $338,150, or $0.002 per share, for the six-month period ended June 30, 2013, compared to a net loss of $6,867,948, or $0.06 per share, for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012. We expect to incur net loss in the fiscal year ending December 31, 2013 primarily attributable to continued research and development, operating and marketing-related expenditures without the benefit of any significant revenue for the remainder of the year.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We have incurred a deficit during the development stage of $82,720,004 primarily as a result of our losses from operations and the non-cash costs relating to the accounting of our convertible notes, derivative and warrant issuances.  These losses have been incurred through a combination of research and development activities as well as patent work related to our technology, expenses related to public reporting obligations and the costs to supporting all of these activities.  We expect to continue to incur additional losses for at least the next twelve months and for the foreseeable future.  These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.  The condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern.

Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to raise additional funds and implement our business plan. Our operations from inception, February 18, 1998 to June 30, 2013 have been funded through issuances of our common stock and convertible notes. As of June 30, 2013, we raised an aggregate of $38,599,982 of which $18,400,888 was from the sale of convertible notes and $20,199,094 was from the sale of stock and exercise of warrants and options. 

On June 30, 2013, we had cash on hand in the amount of $4,505,736.  In addition to the funds on hand, we will require additional funds to continue to operate our business. This includes expenses we will incur in connection with license agreements; product development and commercialization of the AOT technologies; costs to manufacture and ship our products; costs to design and implement an effective system of internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures; costs of maintaining our status as a public company by filing periodic reports with the SEC and costs required to protect our intellectual property. In addition, we have contractual commitments for salaries to one of our executive officers pursuant to an employment agreement, severance payments to a former officer and consulting fees, during 2013 and beyond. In light of our financial commitments over the next several months and its liquidity constraints, we have implemented cost reduction measures in all areas of operations. We intend to review these measures on an ongoing basis and make additional decisions as may be required.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our discussion and analysis of our condensed consolidated financial condition and results of operations is based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements and related disclosures requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We evaluate, on an on-going basis, our estimates and judgments, including those related to the useful life of the assets. We base our estimates on historical experience and assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

The methods, estimates and judgments we use in applying our most critical accounting policies have a significant impact on the condensed consolidated results that we report in our financial statements. The SEC considers an entity’s most critical accounting policies to be those policies that are both most important to the portrayal of a company’s financial condition and results of operations and those that require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain at the time of estimation.. For a more detailed discussion of the accounting policies of the Company, see Note 2 of Notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

We believe the following critical accounting policies, among others, require significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements:

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Certain significant estimates were made in connection with preparing our condensed consolidated financial statements as described in Note 1 to Notes to condensed consolidated financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company periodically issues stock options and warrants to employees and non-employees in non-capital raising transactions for services and for financing costs. The Company accounts for stock option and warrant grants issued and vesting to employees based on the authoritative guidance provided by the Financial Accounting Standards Board whereas the value of the award is measured on the date of grant and recognized over the vesting period. The Company accounts for stock option and warrant grants issued and vesting to non-employees in accordance with the authoritative guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board whereas the value of the stock compensation is based upon the measurement date as determined at either a) the date at which a performance commitment is reached, or b) at the date at which the necessary performance to earn the equity instruments is complete. Non-employee stock-based compensation charges generally are amortized over the vesting period on a straight-line basis. In certain circumstances where there are no future performance requirements by the non-employee, option grants are immediately vested and the total stock-based compensation charge is recorded in the period of the measurement date.

The fair value of the Company's common stock option grant is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which uses certain assumptions related to risk-free interest rates, expected volatility, expected life of the common stock options, and future dividends. Compensation expense is recorded based upon the value derived from the Black-Scholes option pricing model, and based on actual experience. The assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model could materially affect compensation expense recorded in future periods.

Accounting for Warrants and Derivatives 

The Company evaluates all of its financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported in the consolidated statements of operations. For stock-based derivative financial instruments, the Company uses a probability weighted average series Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing models to value the derivative instruments at inception and on subsequent valuation dates.

The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is evaluated at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument could be required within 12 months of the balance sheet date.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-01, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. This ASU clarifies which instruments and transactions are subject to the offsetting disclosure requirements established by ASU 2011-11. This guidance is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning January 1, 2013. We do not believe the adoption of this update will have a material effect on our financial position and results of operations.

Other accounting pronouncements did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company's present or future consolidated financial statements.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk

Not applicable.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

In February 2012, the Company began the process of designing and implementing various financial controls from within our finance department under the supervision of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Furthermore, the Company also hired an outside consultant to further enhance these internal controls, policies and procedures. In March 2013, the Company’s Board of Directors approved and began the implementation of these internal controls, policies and procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The Internal Controls Policy and Sarbanes-Oxley 302 matrix approved by the Board of Directors during the quarter ended March 31, 2013 have been implemented and are functioning as planned. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) were effective as of June 30, 2013 and continue to be effective as of the date of this report.

Disclosure controls are procedures that are designed with the objective of ensuring that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.  Disclosure controls are also designed with the objective of ensuring that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.  Internal control consists of procedures which are designed with the objective of providing reasonable assurance that our transactions are properly authorized, recorded and reported and our assets are safeguarded against unauthorized or improper use, to permit the preparation of our financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

Management’s Quarterly Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. 

Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transaction and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. 

Because of its inherent limitation, internal control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives. 

Our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Controller conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2013 based on the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”).  Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)  were effective as of June 30, 2013.

Our quarterly report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting and management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the SEC that permit us to provide only Management’s report in this annual report.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

There is no litigation of any significance with the exception of the matters that have arisen under, and are being handled in, the normal course of business.  

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes in the risk factors previously disclosed in Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2012, which we filed with the SEC on March 22, 2013. 

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Issuances

During the six months ended June 30, 2013, we issued 19,907,140 shares of common stock upon exercise of warrants at $0.25 to $0.40 per share for aggregate net proceeds of $5,770,639.

During the six months ended June 30, 2013, we issued 30,000 shares of common stock upon exercise of options a $0.30 per share for aggregate net proceeds of $9,000.

During the six months ended June 30, 2013, we issued 50,000 shares of common stock for consulting services valued at $49,000 or $0.98 per share. 

The proceeds received by the company in connection with the above issuances of shares were used for general corporate purposes.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

None

Item 5. Other Information

Increase in Outstanding Shares

During the period from July 1, 2013 through July 31, 2013, the Company issued 1,588,932 shares through grants of common stock to employees as compensation and through the execution of warrants. Employee stock grants totaled 179,000 shares at $1.09 per share at an aggregate cost of $195,110. Stock issued through warrant execution totaled 1,409,932 shares at $0.30 per share for aggregate proceeds to the Company of $42,380.

Item 6. Exhibits

SIGNATURES

  In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the Registrant has caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.

EXHIBITS